Anticipatory/regular bail application under which counsel for the accused-petitioner stated the application had become infructuous and was not pressed. The High Court recorded the statement and dismissed the bail application as infructuous. No merits were decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6183/2025
Vinod Saini S/o Jaisingh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Mandhan, Police Station Mandhan, District Kotputali, Behror.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Nahar Ms. Indra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. J.S.Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
09/07/2025
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us izdV fd;k fd ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= fu"izHkkoh gks pqdk gS] ftls os vkxs pykuk ugha pkgrs gSA
mijksDrkuqlkj ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr }kjk izkFkZuk i= fu"izHkkoh gksus ds dFku dks fjdkMZ ij ysrs gq,] ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
Jitendra Singh Panwar/95
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application should be allowed to proceed after the petitioner sought its withdrawal as infructuous.
Vinod Saini S/o Jaisingh
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
