Disposed

Dinesh Chand S/O Shri Dulli Chand v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Jul 2025CRLMB/5370/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner implicated in FIR 19/2022 under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC filed bail application. Co-accused had earlier obtained interim bail with proceedings in the FIR suspended by order dated 29-04-2025. Since petitioner faces no imminent risk of arrest while that order remains effective, the application is deferred.

What the court decided

AI extract

Dinesh Chand S/O Shri Dulli Chand Vs the State of… — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:25504]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5370/2025 Dinesh Chand S/o Shri Dulli Chand, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Aneh Gate, Bajariya, Police Station Atalband, Bharatpur, District Bharatpur (Raj.)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K.Gupta, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order

¶10

10/07/2025

¶11

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk] iz/kku vkj{kh dsUnz] eFkqjk xsV ftyk Hkjriqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 19@2022 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 467] 468] 471] 120&ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus gsrq ;g izkFkZuk&i= is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶12

cgl lquh xbZA izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ fnukad 06-01-+2022 dh gS ftlesa igys udkjkRed vafre izfrosnu flfoy izd`fr dk ekeyk ekudj izLrqr fd;k x;k FkkA ckn esa vfxze vuqla/kku ds vkns'k fd, x,A bl nkSjku eq[; vfHk;qDr dsnkjukFk us bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB ds le{k ,dyihB nkf.Md fofo/k ;kfpdk la[;k 2341@2025 is'k dh Fkh ftlesa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 29-04-2025 ikfjr dj bl izdj.k dh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vfxze dk;Zokgh ij jksd yxk nh gSA vr% mUgsa vfxze tekur dh lqfo/kk iznku dh tk,A mudk rdZ gS fd bl vkns'k ds ckn Hkh vUos"k.kdrkZ izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks fxj¶rkj djus ij vkeknk gSA izkFkhZ vuqla/kku esa Hkkx ysus ds fy, rRij gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd ftl bdjkjukek dks QthZ crk;k x;k gS] izkFkhZ mldk fu"iknd Hkh ugha gS] ml ij dsoy

[2025:RJ-JP:25504]

[CRLMB-5370/2025]

(2 of 2)

,d lk{kh ek= gSA mldks bl bdjkjukek ls fdlh izdkj dk dksbZ ykHk Hkh izkIr ugha gqvk gSA mudk rdZ gS fd nLrkost ij D;k vadu gS] ;g vko';d ugha fd xokg dks bldh tkudkjh gks] tSlk fd ekuuh; mPPre U;k;ky; us gsedqaoj ckbZ&cuke&lqesj flag ,oa vU; flfoy vihy la[;k 8827@2011 ds ekeys esa fu.khZr fd;k gSA vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks vfxze tekur dh lqfo/kk nh tkosA

¶17

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ us dwVjfpr nLrkost ij xokg d s rkSj ij gLrk{kj fd, gSaA bl nLrkost ij fu"iknd egsUnz flag ds gLrk{kj ugha gksuk ,oa gLrk{kj QthZ gksuk fof/k foKku iz;ksx'kkyk dh tkap fjiksVZ esa vk;k gSA izkFkhZ us mDr bdjkjukek ij egsUnzflag }kjk gLrk{kj ugha djus ds ckotwn xokg cudj mDr bdjkjukek egsUnz flag }kjk fu"ikfnr fd, tkus ds QthZ gLrk{kj fd, gSaA vHkh izdj.k esa vuqla/kku fd;k tkuk gSA vr% izkFkhZ dks vfxze tekur dh lqfo/kk ugha nh tk,A mUgksaus ;g Hkh izdV fd;k fd led{k ihB }kjk ikfjr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa dk;Zokgh ugha fd, tkus ds vkns'k fnukad 29-04-2025 ds izHkkoh gksus ds dkj.k izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks izdj.k esa fxj¶rkj ugha fd;k tk jgk gSA

¶18

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k x;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;k x;kA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 19@2022 iqfyl Fkkuk eFkqjk xsV Hkjriqj dks jn~n djkus ds lEcU/k esa eq[; vfHk;qDr dsnkjukFk dh vksj ls bl U;k;ky; esa ,dyihB nkf.Md fofo/k ;kfpdk la[;k 2341@2025 izLrqr dh xbZ Fkh ftlesa led{k ihB }kjk fnukad 29-04-2025 dks fuEu vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k Fkk&

¶19

In the meantime, no further proceedings in the FIR to take place.

¶20

mDr vkns'k izdj.k dh lquokbZ djds ikfjr fd;k x;k gS ,oa mDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vkxs dksbZ Hkh dk;Zokgh fd, tkus ij jksd yxkbZ xbZ gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks mDr vkns'k ds izHkkoh jgrs gq, bl ekeys esa fxj¶rkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gS vkSj izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks fQygky fxj¶rkjh dh dksbZ vk'kadk ugha gSA vr%% ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk&i= blh izs{k.k ds lkFk fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA Hkfo"; esa vko';drk gksus ij izkFkhZ iqu% izkFkZuk&i= is'k dj ldsxkA

¶21

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶22

AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL /39

Dinesh Chand S/O Shri Dulli Chand v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Dinesh Chand S/O Shri Dulli Chand v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Praveen Kumar S/O Surendra Tyagi Vs State of Rajasthan

Arfina Wife of Noor Mohammad D/O Nasru Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishnu Rajawat S/O Shri Dharmendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Tulsiram S/O Late Shri Pannaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamil Ahmed S/O Shri Umar Ahamed Vs the State of Rajasthan

Mukesh S/O Shri Jagdish Vs State of Rajasthan