Allowed

Ramlakhan S/O Kalyan Bheel v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Apr 2025CRLMB/4444/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Three accused arrested for alleged dacoity preparation under FIR No.55/2025 sought regular bail. The court granted bail considering no criminal antecedents, prolonged trial and custody period, subject to bonds, sureties, monthly police-station presence and conditions.

What did the court decide?

All three petitioners released on bail on personal bond Rs.50,000 each with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each, with monthly presence conditions.

Ramlakhan S/O Kalyan Bheel Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:14936]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4327/2025

¶4

Roopsingh Urf Kalu S/o Babulal Kalbeliya, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Rawan Ji Ki Bardi, Aklera Police Station Aklera, District Jhalawar. (Accused Presently Confined At Sub Jail Atru District Baran)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4443/2025 Rajkumar S/o Nainaram Gurjar, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Manpura Dolada Police Station Sarola, District Jhalawar, Raj. (Accused Presently Confined At Sub Jail Atru District Baran).

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4444/2025

¶16

Ramlakhan S/o Kalyan Bheel, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Kalmodiya, Police Station Sarthal, District Baran, Raj. (Accused Presently Confined At Sub Jail Atru District Baran)

¶17

----Petitioner

¶18

Versus

¶19

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶20

----Respondent

¶21

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhim Singh Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP

¶22

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

¶23

Order

¶24

02/04/2025

¶25

These bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.55/2025 registered at Police Station Kawai, District Baran (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable

(2 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:14936]

[CRLMB-4327/2025]

under Sections 310(4) & 310(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023 and Sections 3/25 & 4/25 of Arms Act, 1959 (Amendment 2019).

¶30

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that it has been alleged in the FIR that petitioners were planning to commit dacoity. It is submitted that according to the impugned order, there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioners are in custody since 12.03.2025 and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose.

¶31

Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners.

¶32

I have considered the contentions.

¶33

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, so also considering the averments made in the FIR and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow these bail applications.

¶34

These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners- (1) Roopsingh Urf Kalu S/o Babulal Kalbeliya, (2) Rajkumar S/o Nainaram Gurjar and (3) Ramlakhan S/o Kalyan Bheel shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two

[2025:RJ-JP:14936]

[CRLMB-4327/2025]

(3 of 3)

sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶39

It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence in second week of every month in the concerned police station.

¶40

If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court.

¶41

Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioners. In case the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard.

¶42

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J

¶43

LALIT MOHAN /271-273

Ramlakhan S/O Kalyan Bheel v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramlakhan S/O Kalyan Bheel v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Banwarilal S/O Mahaveer Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamal Singh Meena S/O Sawai Singh Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohan Lal S/O Late Narayan Vs State of Rajasthan

Rohitash @ Rohitashva S/O Nandlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sukhdev Singh S/O Hardutt Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Bunty Sansi S/O Chhitarmal Sansi Vs State of Rajasthan