The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a land dispute case, noting prior criminal convictions and custodial interrogation concerns, despite the plea being lodged under Section 482 CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:19300]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4103/2025
Mukhtyar Singh S/o Sardul Singh, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Talhairi (327), Kurukshetra (Haryana).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Gadhwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Chaudhary, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
07/05/2025
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds rgr ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= iqfyl Fkkuk] e.Mkuk ftyk dksVk xzkeh.k esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&175@2023 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 8@15] 8@18] 8@29 Lokid vkS"kf/k ,oa eu%izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e esa vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is'k fd;k x;k gSA
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks izdj.k esa feF;k Qalk;k x;k gSA lgvfHk;qDr ls eknd inkFkZ dh cjkenxh gksuk crk;k x;k gS mlds dFkuksa ds vuqlkj mDr eky og izkFkhZ dks nsus ds fy, yk;k Fkk] ftlds vk/kkj ij gh izkFkhZ dks izdj.k eas vfHk;qDr cuk;k x;k gSA vU; fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ lk{; i=koyh ij izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) ugha gSA ftl O;fDr fgEerflag ls mDr eknd inkFkZ ysuk crk;k x;k gS ml fgEer flag dks bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk tekur vfxze tekur dh lqfo/kk iznku dh tk pqdh gSA izkFkhZ ds fo: tks iwoZ ds eqdnes crk, x, gSa] muesa ls ,d izdj.k esa mls cjh fd;k tk pqdk gSA mlls fdlh izdkj dh vfHkj{kk esa iwNrkN (custodial
[2025:RJ-JP:19300]
[CRLMB-4103/2025]
(2 of 2)
interrogation) ugha dh tkuh gSA vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk,A
blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vfxze tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ fn;k gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ls vuqla/kku fd;k tkuk gS ,oa izdj.k esa 940 xzke vQhe] 40 fdyksxzke Mksjk pwjk cjken gqvk gS tks vR;f/kd ek=k esa gSA lgvfHk;qDr }kjk mDr eky izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks ys tkdj nsuk crk;k gSA bl lEcU/k esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ls vuqla/kku fd;k tkuk 'ks"k gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ ds Hkh rhu vU; vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ jgs gSa] og vknru vijk/kh gSA vr% vfxze tekur dh lqfo/kk ugha nh tk,A
geus mHk;i{k ds rdksZa ij euu fd;kA dsl Mk;jh ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkexzh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;kA
i=koyh ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd lgvfHk;qDr dj.knhi ,oa euftUnz flag mQZ dkdk ls 9+40 xzke vQhe ,oa 40 fdyksxzke Mksjk pwjk cjken gqvk gS tks muds vuqlkj izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr eq[r;kj flag dks fn;k tkuk lkeus vk;k gSA mudh /kkjk 27 lk{; vf/kfu;e dh lwpuk ij eq[r;kj flag ds ?kj dh rLnhd Hkh dh xbZ gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr eq[r;kj flag ij iwoZ ds Hkh rhu izdj.k iathc) jgs gSa] ftuesa ls ,d izdj.k /kkjk ,uMhih,l ,DV dk gh gksdj mlesa mls nks"kfl) dj nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS vkSj mlus dkjkokl esa n.Mkof/k O;rhr Hkh dh gSA vHkh rd ds vuqla/kku ls ,slk ugha dgk tk ldrk fd izkFkhZ dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k tk jgk gksA vuqla/kku esa mldh vko';drk Hkh crkbZ xbZ gSA vr% mijksDrkuqlkj rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL /81
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail considering the dispute over significant land holdings?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Mukhtyar Singh
State Of Rajasthan
SHUBHA MEHTA
AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
