Allowed

Krishan Kumar @ Polad S/O Shimbhudayal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Apr 2025CRLMB/3586/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS allowed. Court granted bail considering the offences are triable by Magistrate, trial will take considerable time, and absence of criminal antecedents. Petitioner directed to furnish personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed upon furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Krishan Kumar @ Polad S/O Shimbhudayal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:15224]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3586/2025

¶4

Krishan Kumar @ Polad S/o Shimbhudayal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Hazipur, P.s. Bansur, District Kotputli- Behror (At Present Confined In Central- Jail Alwar)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mithun Bhai Chaturvedi For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar for Mr. Manjeet Kumar

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

¶11

Order

¶12

04/04/2025

¶13

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.421/2024 registered at Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) for the offences punishable under Sections 309(4), 115(2), 126(2), 333 & 351(3) of BNS. Investigation is being conducted for the offences punishable under Sections 309(4), 115(2), 126(2), 333, 351(3) & 238-B of BNS.

¶14

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since 23.02.2025 and there are no criminal

(2 of 2)

[2025:RJ-JP:15224]

[CRLMB-3586/2025]

antecedents against him. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶20

I have considered the contentions.

¶21

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by both the parties, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; trial will take considerable time in its conclusion; absence of criminal antecedents as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

¶22

This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Krishan Kumar @ Polad S/o Shimbhudayal, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

The observation made herein above is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶24

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J

¶25

GAUTAM JAIN /51

Krishan Kumar @ Polad S/O Shimbhudayal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishan Kumar @ Polad S/O Shimbhudayal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Motilal S/O Badrilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Manoj S/O Ashok Vs State of Rajasthan

Manvendra Son of Suresh Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikram Singh Gurjar @ Vikram Katariya S/O Amarsingh Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul S/O Prabhdayal Vs State of Rajasthan

Kasim Khan @ Pav Son of Shri Mehmud Hasan @ Munna Vs the State of Rajasthan