Madan Singh S/O Hindu Singh, Vs State of Rajasthan

[2025:RJ-JP:28071]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 342/2025

Madan Singh S/o Hindu Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Moyakheda, Ps Bhawani Mandi, Dist. Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present Confined At Sub-Jail Bhawani Mandi, Jhalawar)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Shafiqur Rahman Ms. SarojJat
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A.
	Mr. SanjayKheda

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

¶11

(Through Video Conferencing)

¶12

Order

¶13

25/07/2025

¶14

The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by way of filing application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. at the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the matter are

¶15

tabulated herein below:

¶16

S.No.	Particulars of t	he Case
1.	FIR Number	94/2022
2.	Concerned Police Station	Bhawanimandi
3.	District	Jhalawar
4.	Offences alleged in the FIR	Under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 302 and 307 of IPC
5.	Offences added,if any	-
6.	Date of passing of impugned order	-

(2 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:28071]

[CRLMB-342/2025]

It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioner that no case for the alleged offences is made out against him and his incarceration is not warranted. There are no factors at play in the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the accused-petitioner and he has been made accused based on conjectures and surmises. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the co-accused Ishwar Singh and Shyam Singh have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 14.11.2024. He further submits that case of the petitioner is not distinguishable with that of the case of the aforesaid co-accused who have already been enlarged on bail. 3. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that the present case is not fit for enlargement of accused on bail.

¶21

I have considered the submissions made by both the parties and have perused the material available on record. Co-accused Ishwar Singh and Shyam Singh have already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 14.11.2024. Thus, on the ground of parity and considering the fact that there is high probability that the trial may take long time to conclude, it is deemed suitable to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner in the present matter.

¶22

Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner as named in the cause title shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two

(3 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:28071]

[CRLMB-342/2025]

sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶27

(FARJAND ALI),J

¶28

9 divya/-

Madan Singh S/O Hindu Singh, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madan Singh S/O Hindu Singh, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nepal Singh S/O Shri Sardar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Bahadur Singh S/O Shobhan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ompal Singh S/O Late Bagdawat Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Shanu @ Syed Sadiq Ali S/O Syed Abid Ali Vs State of Rajasthan

Dilip Son of Shri Chatursingh @ Chature Vs State of Rajasthan

Devendra Singh S/O Shri Shivraj Singh Vs State of Rajasthan