Allowed

Dinesh Meena S/O Tejlal Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Mar 2025CRLMB/3365/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 483 BNSS by a junior assistant accused under Section 7 PC Act and Section 61(2) BNS. Considering overall circumstances without commenting on merits, the court enlarged him on bail with a personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each, to appear before trial court.

Dinesh Meena S/O Tejlal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan — Corruption | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:10649]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

3365/2025

¶5

Dinesh Meena S/o Tejlal Meena, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Gram Jhopadeen, Tehsil Mahua, District Dausa, At Present Junior Assistant/registry Delivery Clerk, Sub Registrar Office, Bahadurpur, District Alwar (Rajasthah). (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail, Alwar).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Gupta, Adv. For : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶12

10/03/2025

¶13

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.31/2025 registered at Police Station C.P.S. Jaipur, ACB District for the offence(s) under Section(s) 7 of PC Act and under Section(s) 61(2) of BNS.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel

[CRLMB-3365/2025]

[2025:RJ-JP:10649]

(2 of 2)

further submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶20

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Dinesh Meena S/o Tejlal Meena shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶23

DANISH USMANI /368

Dinesh Meena S/O Tejlal Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Meena S/O Tejlal Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prahlad Meena Vs Dholaram Gurjar and Anr.

Bablu Vs Smt. Renu

Hanuman Son of Shri Badri Lal Vs Kailash Chand Saini Son of Nainakram Saini

Talim S/O Jaikam @ Jaikamdeen Vs State of Rajasthan

Pritam Kumar Goel S/O Shri Moti Ramji Goel, Vs Late Smt. Kaushliya Mishra W/O Late Shri V.N. Mishra

Hasan Mansoori S/O Mithu Khan Vs State of Rajasthan