Dismissed

Meghram S/O Mulya v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Jul 2025CRLMB/188/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court rejected the bail application as it was filed after an earlier bail application failed because no anticipatory bail was evident, and trial proceedings under Section 482 CrPC did not reveal coercive action. The petitioners were already under judicial bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner's bail application dismissed and existing judicial bail confirmed.

Meghram S/O Mulya Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:26761]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 188/2025

¶4

Meghram S/o Mulya, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Khedli, Police Station Piloda, District Gangapur City.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D K Dixit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Poonia, PP with Mr. Shubham Kr. Sain, AAAG Ms. Priyanka Chouhan

¶10

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶11

Order

¶12

17/07/2025

¶13

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk ihyksnk] ftyk&lokbZ ek/kksiqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 95@2022 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 406 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus gsrq ;g izkFkZuki= is”k fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

cgl lquh xbZA izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks izdj.k esa feF;k Qalk;k x;k gSA okLrfodrk esa i{kdkjksa ds e/; tehu ds fodz; dks ysdj laO;ogkj gqvk Fkk vkSj fodz;i= Hkh fu"ikfnr fd;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ }kjk fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ /kks[kk/kM+h ugha dh xbZ gS] mlus bdjkjukek djrs le; gh cSad dk cdk;k gksus laca/kh rF; izdV fn;k FkkA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us izdj.k izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ jn~n djus ds fy, /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh dk;Zokgh Hkh dj j[kh gS] ftlesa izkFkhZ ds i{k esa dksbZ n.MkRed dk;Zokgh ¼No Corecive action½ ugha djus laca/kh vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gqvk gSA ekeyk flfoy izd`fr dk gS rFkk izkFkhZ us vUos"k.k esa Hkkx ys fy;k gSA vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA

[2025:RJ-JP:26761]

[CRLMB-188/2025]

(2 of 2)

blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd o ifjoknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr }kjk tks bdjkjukek fd;k x;k Fkk] mlesa mlus Li"Vr% ;g fy[kk Fkk fd og cSad dk cdk;k pqdkdj nks ekg esa vns;rk izek.ki= ykdj nsxk] blfy, mUgksaus jftLVªh djokbZ FkhA mudk rdZ gS fd tc /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds izdj.k esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds i{k esa dksbZ n.MkRed dk;Zokgh ¼No Corecive action½ ugha djus laca/kh vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gqvk gS] rks mldh fxjQ~rkjh dk dksbZ vans'kk gh ugha gS] blfy, vfxze tekur gsrq izLrqr ;g izkFkZuki= iks"k.kh; ugha gSA Lo;a izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDRk us ,d flfoy okn nk;j dj j[kk gS] ftlesa 2]21]000 :i;s esa tehu csps tkus dk dFku fd;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ ds 06 vkijkf/kd izdj.k lafLFkr gSaA vr% izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr izkFkZuki= fujLr fd;k tkosA

¶19

geus rdZ&fordZ ij euu fd;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;k x;kA Lo;a izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr }kjk U;k;ky; ds le{k ;g rF; izdV fd;k x;k gS fd mldh vksj ls izLrqr /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds izdj.k esa bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB us izkFkhZ ds i{k esa dksbZ n.MkRed dk;Zokgh ¼No Corecive action½ ugha djus laca/kh vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gS] ftlesa izkFkhZ dks fxjQrkj ugha djus dk vkns'k Hkh lekfgr gSA vr% orZeku esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh fxjQ~rkjh dk dksbZ vans'kk ¼apprehension½ ugha gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa vfxze tekur izkFkZuki= bl izdze ij pyus ;ksX; ugha gSA

¶20

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr mDr tekur izkFkZuki= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA iwoZ esa ikfjRk vUrfje vkns'k] ;fn dksbZ gks] rks fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶21

;g Hkh Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd Hkfo"; esa bl laca/k esa volj mRiUu gksus ij izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr iqu% fof/k vuqlkj vfxze tekur gsrq izkFkZuki= izLrqr djus gsrq Lora= jgsxkA

¶22

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶23

VISHAL SHARMA /34

Meghram S/O Mulya v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Meghram S/O Mulya v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Devendra Kumar S/O Harpal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra Vs State

Mansingh S/O Shri Narayan Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Mohd. Isaq Abbasi Advocate S/O Late Shri Gulam Rasul Vs the Union of India

Pooja Kanwar D/O Kishore Singh, W/O Sohan Singh, Vs State of Rajasthan

Ikbal Khan S/O Shri Mushi Khan Vs State of Rajasthan