Allowed

Vinod S/O Jagdish v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC19 Dec 2025CRLMB/16456/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 483 BNSS for offences of FIR 197/2025 (Sections 309(4), 61(2) BNS). Applicant in custody since 26-10-2025; five prior cases concluded and no other pending cases. Considering custody period and likely delay in trial, the court granted bail with personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail subject to personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each; presence required on every date of trial.

Vinod S/O Jagdish Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:51472]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16456/2025

¶4

Vinod S/o Jagdish, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Mohanpura Kanjar Basti, Police Station Indergarh, Dist Bundi (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp, Bundi.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Meeta Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, P.P.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶11

Order

¶12

19/12/2025

¶13

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fouksn dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad& 17-11-2025 ds fo:) ;g tekur vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk] mls iqfyl Fkkuk&bUnzx<+] ftyk cwanh esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 197@2025] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 309¼4½ ,oa 61¼2½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk esa fu;fer tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

cgl lquh xbZA

¶15

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks ekeys esa >waBk Qalk;k x;k gS] izkFkhZ fnukad 26-10-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] mlds fo:) iwoZ esa ikap izdj.k yafcr Fks] ftu lHkh yafcr izdj.kksa dk fuLrkj.k gks pqdk gS] mlds fo:) orZeku esa vU; dksbZ Hkh izdj.k yafcr ugha gSa] mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd izdj.k ds lg&vfHk;qDr fo'kky dk tekur vkosnu iwoZ esa blh

[2025:RJ-JP:51472]

[CRLMB-16456/2025]

(2 of 2)

U;k;ky; }kjk Lohdkj fd;k x;k gS] izdj.k ds vuqla/kku ,oa fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gS] vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkosA

¶20

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶21

geus nksuksa i{kksa }kjk izLrqr rdkasZ&fordksZa ij euu fd;kA izkFkhZ fnukad 26-10-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] izdj.k ds vuqla/kku ,oa fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk ls badkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk] izdj.k ds lg&vfHk;qDr dk tekur vkosnu iwoZ esa blh U;k;ky; }kjk Lohdkj fd;k x;k gS] vr% nksuksa i{kksa ds vf/koDrkx.k }kjk j[ks x, rdkZsa] lg&vfHk;qDr dks nh xbZ tekur] izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr] izkFkhZ dh vfHkj{kk vof/k o vU; ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj djus ds ckn izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vafre jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶22

ifj.kker% ;g tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼v{kjs :i;s ipkl gtkj ek=½ dk O;fDrxr ca/k&i= o 25]000&25]000@&:i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd og izdj.k ds fopkj.k ds nkSjku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rkjh[k is'kh ij mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk rks izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fouksn iq= Jh txnh'k dks ¼;fn og vU; fdlh izdj.k esa oakfNr u gksa rks½ vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶23

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶24

Mahesh Adwani/18

Vinod S/O Jagdish v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod S/O Jagdish v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudhir Yadav S/O Ashok Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Ganesh Bawariya S/O Sardar Bawariya Vs the State of Rajasthan

Sohil S/O Shri Aasam Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul Hada S/O Devendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Rohit @ Kalla S/O Shri Rajaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Sonu S/O Shri Charandas Vs State of Rajasthan