Allowed¶27

Roki Son of Mohana Alias Mohan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Dec 2025CRLMB/16225/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail allowed; Rajasthan HC Jaipur; CRLMB 15773/2025 & 16225/2025; Section 483 BNSS; Sections 305(a) & 331(4) BNS; FIR 488/2025 PS Kaman District Deeg; Bablu son of Gainda; Roki son of Mohana alias Mohan; personal bond Rs.50,000/-; two sureties Rs.25,000/- each; Justice Vinod Kumar Bharwani; order dated 10/12/2025.

What did the court decide?

Release of both accused-petitioners on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, subject to appearance before the Trial Court on all subsequent hearing dates. ¶27

Roki Son of Mohana Alias Mohan Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶27

Issue for consideration

Whether the accused-petitioners (Bablu and Roki), implicated in F.I.R. No. 488/2025 of P.S. Kaman, District Deeg, for offences punishable under Sections 305(a) & 331(4) B.N.S., should be enlarged on bail under Section 483 B.N.S.S.

¶19

Court's answer

Taking into consideration the submissions and overall facts and circumstances of the case, and without commenting upon detailed merits, the Court deemed it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

¶26

Ratio / Principle

The bail applications are allowed; accused-petitioners Bablu S/o Gainda and Roki S/o Mohana Alias Mohan shall be released on bail, if not required in any other case, provided each furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, and appears before that Court (or any Court to which the matter is transferred) on all subsequent dates of hearing and when called upon.

¶27

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench), single Judge (Vinod Kumar Bharwani, J.), Order dt. 10/12/2025: Bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. of Bablu S/o Gainda (CRLMB 15773/2025) and Roki S/o Mohana Alias Mohan (CRLMB 16225/2025), accused in F.I.R. No. 488/2025 of P.S. Kaman, District Deeg, for offences punishable under Sections 305(a) & 331(4) B.N.S., ALLOWED. Without commenting on detailed merits, the Court enlarged both accused-petitioners on bail on a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, subject to attendance before the Trial Court. Counsel had urged false implication, custody since 30.10.2025, delay in lodging the FIR (incident 14.09.2025, FIR 28.09.2025) and triability by a Court of Magistrate; the Public Prosecutor opposed the bail applications.

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:50218]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15773/2025

¶4

Bablu S/o Gainda, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Indra Colony, Kaman, Presently R/o Bhojan Thali, Kaman, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16225/2025 Roki Son Of Mohana Alias Mohan, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Lala Mohalla, Kama, Police Station Kama, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg).

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Ankit Khandelwal Mr. Arafat Hussain
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, P.P. with
	Ms. Arti Sharma, Dy. G.A.

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶17

Order

¶18

10/12/2025

¶19

The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.488/2025, registered at Police Station Kaman, District Deeg for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 305(a) & 331(4) of B.N.S.

[2025:RJ-JP:50218]

[CRLMB-15773/2025]

(2 of 3)

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case, they have nothing to do with the alleged offence(s) and they are behind the bars since 30.10.2025. Counsel further submit that although the incident occurred on 14.09.2025, the F.I.R. was lodged on 28.09.2025 and no explanation has been furnished for the delay in lodging the FIR. The case is triable by a Court of Magistrate. Trial/investigation of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, their further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and they are ready and willing to furnish their bail bonds. Therefore, the bail applications deserve to be allowed.

¶24

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications.

¶25

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record.

¶26

Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

¶27

Therefore, the bail applications are allowed . Accusedpetitioners, namely Bablu S/o Gainda & Roki Son Of Mohana Alias Mohan, shall be released on bail, if they are not required in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any other Court to which

[2025:RJ-JP:50218]

[CRLMB-15773/2025]

(3 of 3)

the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and

¶32

as and when they are called upon to do so.

¶33

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J