Allowed

Deepak Urf Kochya S/O Shri Ramkaran v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Dec 2025CRLMB/16025/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Vinod Kumar Bharwani allowed the bail application of the accused Deepak Urf Kochya. The Court considered the long trial duration and the petitioner's readiness to furnish bonds, ordering release on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

What did the court decide?

Release of accused on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Deepak Urf Kochya S/O Shri Ramkaran Vs State of Rajasthan — Property and Title | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:49782]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16025/2025

¶4

Deepak Urf Kochya S/o Shri Ramkaran, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Gurjaro Ki Sirohi, Police Station Narena, District Jaipur Rural. At Present Resident Of Goner, Plot No. 52 Sector 05 Ramsingh Colony, Police Station Malpura Gate, District Jaipur City (Raj.) (At Present Accused Confined In Central Jail Jaipur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gutpa, P.P.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶11

Order

¶12

08/12/2025

¶13

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.274/2022 registered at Police Station Shahpura (Jaipur Rural), District Jaipur Rural for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 457, 380 & 201 of I.P.C.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case, he has nothing to do with the alleged offence(s) and he is behind the bars since 25.09.2025. Counsel further submits that although the FIR was lodged in the year 2022 and the petitioner was taken into custody on 25.09.2025. After investigation, charge-sheet has been filed in the matter. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude,

¶15

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-16025/2025]

¶16

[2025:RJ-JP:49782]

¶17

till then, his further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and he is ready and willing to furnish his bail bonds. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶19

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record.

¶20

Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶21

Therefore, the bail application is allowed . Accusedpetitioner, namely Deepak Urf Kochya S/o Shri Ramkaran, shall be released on bail, if he is not required in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/(Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so.

¶22

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶23

SAURABH /08

Deepak Urf Kochya S/O Shri Ramkaran v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Urf Kochya S/O Shri Ramkaran v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravi Jain S/O Shri Ramesh Chand Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Tofan Singh Alias Toofan Singh S/O Poonamchand Vs State of Rajasthan

Narpat Singh S/O Bhagwan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Nisar S/O Aajad Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Shahbaz S/O Shri Nizammuddin Vs State of Rajasthan

Kayyum Khan S/O Rahamat Vs State of Rajasthan