Allowed

Wasim Akram S/O Shri Hasam v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Dec 2025CRLMB/14852/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Six accused sought regular bail against an earlier refused order under Section 483 BNSS in FIR No. 316/2025 registered at Deeg police station. Considering the factual position, evidence gathered, detention period and expected trial duration, the High Court granted conditional bail with personal surety and two guarantors.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted: personal bond of Rs. 50,000 each plus two sureties of Rs. 25,000-25,000; released on parole subject to daily court attendance unless wanted in another case.

Wasim Akram S/O Shri Hasam Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:49130]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14852/2025

¶4

Wasim Akram S/o Shri Hasam, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Bhilmaka, Police Station Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur).

¶5

Arbaz S/o Shri Hasam, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Bhilmaka, Police Station Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur).

¶6

Jakar S/o Shri Nawab, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Bhilmaka, Police Station Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur).

¶7

Saheed S/o Shri Inayat Khan, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Bhilmaka, Police Station Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur).

¶8

Mohammad Akram @ Vikram S/o Shri Ramjan, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Bhilmaka, Police Station Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur).

¶9

----Petitioners

¶10

Versus

¶11

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶12

----Respondent

¶13

Connected With

¶14

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15218/2025 Aamir S/o Shri Khairun, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Bheelmaka, Police Station Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg).

¶15

----Petitioner

¶16

Versus

¶17

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶18

----Respondent

¶19

For Petitioner(s) : Jh eqLrkd vgen Jh izeksn dqekj

¶20

[CRLMB-14852/2025]

¶21

[2025:RJ-JP:49130] (2 of 3) Jh fxjkZt izlkn Jh vafdr [k.Msyoky For Respondent(s) : fe- eatw nos] yksd vfHk;kstd

¶22

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶23

Order

¶24

03-12-2025

¶25

izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad& 06-11-2025 ds fo:) ;s iFkd iFkd tekur vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 483 ch-,u-,l-,l- mUgsa iqfyl Fkkuk Mhx] ftyk Mhx esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 316@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 61¼02½] 313] 317¼02½] 318¼04½] 319¼02½] 336¼03½] 338] 340¼02½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk] ,oa /kkjk&66¼Mh½ lwpuk ,oa izkS|ksfxdh vf/kfu;e 2000 esa fu;fer tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd, x, gSa A

¶26

nksuksa tekur izkFkZuk i= ,d gh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ls lacaf/kr gksus ds dkj.k budk fuLrkj.k ,d lkFk fd;k tk jgk gS A

¶27

cgl lquh xbZ A

¶28

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k dks ekeys esa >waBk Qalk;k x;k gS] izkFkhZx.k fnukad 25-10-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSa] izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ iqfyl }kjk gh ntZ djok;h xbZ gS] muds [kkrs esa dksbZ Hkh ysu&nsu ugha gqvk gS] izdj.k dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gS] vr% izkFkhZx.k dks tekur ij NksM+k tkos A

¶29

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur izkFkZuk i=ksa dk fojks/k fd;k A

¶30

geus nksuksa i{kksa }kjk izLrqr rdksZ o fordksZa ij euu fd;kA izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr] vuqla/kku ds nkSjku vk;h lk{;] izkFkhZx.k dh vfHkj{kk vof/k] vUoh{kk esa yxus okys le; o vU; ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj djus ds ckn] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vafre jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZx.k dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶31

[2025:RJ-JP:49130]

¶32

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-14852/2025]

¶33

ifj.kker% ;s nksuksa tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;s tkrs gSa rFkk vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izR;sd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼v{kjs :i;s ipkl gtkj ek=½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o 25]000&25]000@& :i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd og izdj.k ds fopkj.k ds nkSjku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rkjh[k is'kh ij mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk rks izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k 1- olhe vdje iq= Jh gkle] 2- vjckt iq= Jh gkle] 3- tkdj iq= Jh ucko] 4- 'kghn iq= Jh buk;r [kka] 5- ekSgEen vdje mQZ fodze iq= Jh jetku ,oa 6- vkfej iq= Jh [kS:u dks ¼;fn og vU; fdlh izdj.k esa oakfNr u gksa rks½ vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶34

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶35

Rishikesh Soni/88-89

Wasim Akram S/O Shri Hasam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Wasim Akram S/O Shri Hasam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jeevraj S/O Shri Gheesalal Vs State of Rajasthan

Jayram S/O Shri Ramcharan Vs State of Rajasthan

Yadram Gurjar Son of Ramswaroop Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Bahadur @ Bhadur Singh S/O Maharaj Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ravindra Gajraj S/O Dharmchand Vs State of Rajasthan

Satish Chand S/O Chhitarmal Vs State of Rajasthan