Allowed

Jeetu @ Jitendra S/O Shri Atar Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC21 Nov 2025CRLMB/14396/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two connected bail applications arising from FIR No.281/2025 under various BNS sections including attempt to murder. The court, without expressing any opinion on merits, granted bail noting no recovery from petitioners, absence of criminal past, and delay in trial.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each, to appear before trial court on all dates till trial conclusion.

Jeetu @ Jitendra S/O Shri Atar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:47147]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14395/2025

¶4

Hamid Hussain S/o Shri Ambrela, Aged About 20 Years, Bhuchaka Ps Puhana District Nuh Haryana Presently Residing At Honda Chowk Banveerpur P.s. Khushkheda, District Khairthal Tijara (Raj). Accused Applicant In Jail At Kishangarh Bas.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14396/2025 Jeetu @ Jitendra S/o Shri Atar Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Banveerpur, P.s. Khushkheda, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.). (Accused Applicant In Jail At Kishangarh Bas).

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

		Versus
State Of Rajasthan,	Thro	ugh Public Prosecutor	----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Dinesh Yadav Mr. Ankit Yadav
For Respondent(s) For Complainant	: :	Ms. Manju Dave, PP Mr. SanjayKhan

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

¶14

Order

¶15

21/11/2025

¶16

The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.281/2025 registered at Police Station-Tapukada, District-Bhiwadi for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 140(3) and 307 of BNS.

[2025:RJ-JP:47147]

[CRLMB-14395/2025]

(2 of 3)

Since both the bail applications have arisen from common order, hence, they are being decided by this single order.

¶21

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submits that no recovery has been made from the present petitioners and no test identification parade was conducted. Petitioners are behind the bars since 14.10.2025 without any criminal past. No custodial interrogation is required. The trial of the cases may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed.

¶23

Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail applications.

¶24

On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.

¶25

Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners -Hamid Hussain S/o Shri Ambrela and Jeetu @ Jitendra S/o Shri Atar Singh shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the

[2025:RJ-JP:47147]

[CRLMB-14395/2025]

(3 of 3)

sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.

¶30

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶31

Arun/137-138

Jeetu @ Jitendra S/O Shri Atar Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jeetu @ Jitendra S/O Shri Atar Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rudranarayan S/O Ramprasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajendra S/O Hariprasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul S/O Pappu @ Dhanraj Vs the State of Rajasthan

Vishnu S/O Jodharaj Vs State of Rajasthan

Krishana S/O Hansraj Vs State of Rajasthan

Saleel S/O Shri Gafur Kha Vs the State of Rajasthan