Golu @ Naresh S/O Gajanand Vs State of Rajasthan

[2025:RJ-JP:5257]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1430/2025

Golu @ Naresh S/o Gajanand, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Gayatri Nagar Police Station Atru, District Baran (Raj.) (Presently Confined In District Jail Baran)

¶5

----Accused-Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Buddhi Prakash Meena, PP For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP, Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

¶11

Order

¶12

06/02/2025

¶13

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.03/2025 registered at Police Station Atru, District Baran for the offence punishable under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023. Investigating is being conducted in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 331(4) and 305A of BNS, 2023.

¶14

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. He further submits that no further recovery is required to be made from the petitioner. He argues that trial of the case will take considerable time. He contends that the petitioner is in

(2 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:5257]

[CRLMB-1430/2025]

custody since 03.01.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. He submits that LED TV has been recovered at the instance of the petitioner.

¶20

I have considered the contentions.

¶21

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as also looking to the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

¶22

This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Golu @ Naresh S/o Gajanand shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded.

(3 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:5257]

[CRLMB-1430/2025]

Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard.

¶28

If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court.

¶29

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J

¶30

MADAN/289

Golu @ Naresh S/O Gajanand v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Golu @ Naresh S/O Gajanand v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kartar S/O Ramanlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Prabhulal S/O Dhulilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Abhimanyu Ydadav S/O Raj Singh Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul Singh Son of Ramchandra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Saroj W/O Naresh Vs State of Rajasthan

Radhacharan S/O Sundar Lal Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan