Regular bail sought in FIR for offences under Sections 364(A) and 395 IPC. Court noted a compromise between parties, apparent financial dispute, and prolonged judicial custody, and enlarged the petitioner on bail on furnishing personal bond and two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:42831]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13820/2025
Veersingh @ Veeru S/o Shri Ramchandra, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Tarwala, Police Station Kishangarhbas District Khairthal-Tijara (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumer Singh Ola For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P. Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, P.P. Mr. Yogesh Chawla for complainant
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order
17/10/2025
This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.86/2024 registered at Police Station Kishangarhbas, District Khairthal-Tijara for the offence(s) under Section(s) 364(A) & 395 of IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accusedpetitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties. Learned counsel also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application whereas learned counsel for the
[2025:RJ-JP:42831]
[CRLMB-13820/2025]
(2 of 2)
complainant-Mr. Yogesh Chawla has not disputed the aforementioned submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
The FIR and the order of the learned trial court reveals that the petitioner was kidnapped by the accused and as per his version, he was taken to the fields and some amount was put in his account through his mobile as well and thereafter, the amount and the phone was taken away. It seems to be a financial dispute between the parties.
Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accusedpetitioner Veersingh @ Veeru S/o Shri Ramchandra shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J
DANISH USMANI /710
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be enlarged on regular bail in an FIR under Sections 364(A) and 395 IPC given a compromise between the parties and prolonged custody.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Veersingh @ Veeru S/o Shri Ramchandra
State of Rajasthan
Baljinder Singh Sandhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
