Vishnu Son of Phoolchand v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench; S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13769/2025 (CRLMB-13769/2025); neutral citation [2025:RJ-JP:48929]; decided 02-12-2025 by Vinod Kumar Bharwani, J. Anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS sought against order dated 07-10-2025 of the court below in FIR No. 276/2025 of PS Taleda, District Bundi, under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 110 BNS. Court found petitioner named in FIR with active role per case diary, rejected false-implication plea, found no exceptional circumstances, and dismissed the application. Petitioner: Vishnu s/o Phoolchand; counsel: Krishna Singh for petitioner, Amit Gupta (Public Prosecutor) for the State. Source text is Hindi in legacy encoding.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner was named in the First Information Report and, as per the case-diary statement, played an active role in the incident; consequently, it cannot be said that he has been falsely implicated in the case.