Allowed

Hari Singh S/O Shri Mausariya v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Dec 2025CRLMB/13604/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application for bail was pending; Intermediate Bail Order issued on 25-02-2025 changed post-remand to consequence of Supreme Court reference; Petitioner not produced further; Bail granted with condition not to repeat future order requests.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail with directions to appear at each Court Hearing; Bail may be cancelled if petitioner fails to comply with conditions or repeats future order requests.

Hari Singh S/O Shri Mausariya Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:48934]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous III Bail Application No. 13604/2025

¶4

Hari Singh S/o Shri Mausariya, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Village Sop, Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli Presently Resident Of Near Salauda Power House Gangapur City, Police Station Udai Mod, Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) (The Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Sub Jail Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Rajneesh Gupta
	Mr. Shiv Kumar Sharma
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶11

Order

¶12

02/12/2025

¶13

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk mnsbZ eksM+] ftyk&xaxkiqj flVh esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 89@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@20 Lokid vkS"kf/k vkSj eu% izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e 1985 esa tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus gsrq ;g r`rh; izkFkZuki= is”k fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

cgl lquh xbZA fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd mls izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ dh vkj ls izLrqr f}rh; tekur izkFkZuki= bl U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 25-02-2025 dks fujLr fd;k x;k] mlds i'pkr~ vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k yxHkx 10 ekg vkSj c<+ pqdh gSA mudk rdZ gS fd fnukad 25-02-2025 ds vkns'k ds fo:) mUgksaus ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; esa ,l-,y-ih- izLrqr dh Fkh] tks fujLr djrs gq, ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us lkjoku~ lk{khx.k ds ijhf{kr gksus ds i'pkr~ iqu% izkFkZuki= izLrqr djus dh mUeqfDr iznku dh

¶15

[2025:RJ-JP:48934]

¶16

[CRLMB-13604/2025]

¶17

FkhA vc izdj.k esa 07 lk{khx.k ijhf{kr gks pqds gSa] ftuesa ls lkjoku~ lk{khx.k ihMCY;w 5 czgeflag o ihMCY;w 6 jktkjke ¼tks fd vkns'k ds i'pkr ijhf{kr gq, gSa½ cjkenxh ds xokg gSA mudk rdZ gS fd mDr cjkenxh ds nksuksa gh lk{khx.k iqfyldehZ gSa] tcfd cjkenxh ds Lora= xokg cuk;s tkus pkfg, Fks rFkk bldk Li"Vhdj.k dsoy Lora= xokg miyC/k ugha gksuk crk;k x;k gS] tks fd fo'oluh; ugha gSA cjkenxh ds mDr nksuksa gh lk{khx.k dh ekSds ij mifLFkfr Hkh fo'oluh; ugha gSA mudk ?kVuk ds le; ekSds ij mifLFkr gksus laca/kh jkstukepk esa dksbZ banzkt ugha gSA vfHk;qDr dh ryk'kh gsrq vfHk;qDr dh lgefr dh ekSf[kd yh xbZ vFkok fyf[kr] bl laca/k esa Hkh mDr lk{khx.k ds dFku esa lkjoku~ fojks/kkHkkl gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks vfHkj{kk esa 01 o"kZ lk<+s 06 ekg gks pqds gSaA izkFkhZ ds fo:) iwoZ ds tks nks izdj.k yfEcr gksuk crk;s x;s gSa] os eknd inkFkZ dh y?kq ek=k ls lacaf/kr gSaA orZeku~ izdj.k Hkh y?kq ek=k ls dqN gh vf/kd ek=k dk gSA mudk rdZ gS fd ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us blh izdfr ds ,d izdj.k Shambhulal Gurjar @ Rohit vs. State of Rajasthan Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 16671/2024 Dated 23.04.2024 esa] tgka vfHk;qDr ds fo:) okf.kfT;d ek=k ls lacaf/kr gksdj ,uMhih,l vf/kfu;e dk izdj.k ntZ Fkk ,oa rhu vU; leku izdfr ds izdj.k yfEcr Fks] ogka mls 01 o"kZ 08 ekg dh vof/k vfHkj{kk esa gksus ij mls eqDr fd;k FkkA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds vkf/kiR; ls rks y?kq ek=k ls FkksM+h gh vf/kd ek=k esa eknd inkFkZ dh cjkenxh gqbZ gS vkSj 'ks"k yfEcr nks izdj.k Hkh y?kq ek=k ds gh gSaA izdj.k esa vHkh dqy 15 esa ls 07 gh xokg ijhf{kr gq, gSaA mud ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ fnO;kax O;fDr gS rFkk izdj.k ds fopkj.k eas le; yxsxkA vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur dk ykHk iznku fd;k tkosA

¶18

blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd iwoZ esa bl U;k;ky; us f}rh; tekur izkFkZuki= fnukad 25-02-2025 dks fujLr fd;k Fkk] mlds i'pkr~ vfHk;qDr us ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; esa ,l,yih nk;j dh Fkh] tks mlds fo:) vU; izdj.k yfEcr gksus vkSj mlds }kjk tekur ds izko/kkuksa dk nq:i;ksx djus ds vk/kkj ij fujLr dh xbZ gSA izdj.k dh ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa dksbZ lkjoku~ ifjorZu ugha gqvk gSA vfHk;qDr ds fo:) xEHkhj vijk/k dk vfHk;ksx gSA vr%

[2025:RJ-JP:48934]

[CRLMB-13604/2025]

(3 of 4)

vijk/k dh xEHkhjrk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, r`rh; tekur izkFkZuki= fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶23

izLrqr rdksZa ij euu fd;kA dsl Mk;jh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ dh vkj ls izLrqr f}rh; tekur izkFkZuki= bl U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 25-02-2025 dks fujLr fd;s tkus ds i'pkr~ vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k yxHkx 10 ekg vkSj c<+ pqdh gSA izdj.k esa dqy 15 lk{khx.k gSa] ftuesa ls vHkh ek= 07 lk{khx.k ds dFku gh ys[kc) gq, gSaA izdj.k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr tks fu.kZ; Shambhulal Gurjar @ Rohit vs. State of Rajasthan Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 16671/2024 Dated 23.04.2024 izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] og okf.kfT;d ek=k ls lacaf/kr Fkk rFkk mlesa vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ ds rhu leku izdfr ds vkijkf/kd izdj.k lafLFkr Fks] tcfd orZeku~ ekeyk y?kq izdfr ls dqN gh vf/kd ek=k 1 fdyks 320 xzke xkatk ls lacaf/kr gS rFkk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ ds tks nks vkijkf/kd izdj.k lafLFkr gksuk crk;s x;s gSa] os Hkh y?kq ek=k ls lacaf/kr gSaA izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk ls budkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA vr% mi;qZDr rF;ksa&ifjfLFkfr;ksa ,oa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d fu.kZ; Shambhulal Gurjar @ Rohit vs. State of Rajasthan ds izdk'k esa c<+h gqbZ vfHkj{kk vof/k rFkk fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, bl Lrj ij ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr r`rh; tekur izkFkZuki= l'krZ Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶24

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g rrh; tekur izkFkZuki= bl 'krZ ds lkFk fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr Hkfo"; esa bl izdkj ds vijk/k dh iqujkofRr ugha djsxk] Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa ;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks] rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk;sA

[2025:RJ-JP:48934]

[CRLMB-13604/2025]

(4 of 4)

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks ;g Hkh funsZ'k fn;s tkrs gSa fd og izdj.k ds fopkj.k rd lacaf/kr iqfyl Fkkus esa izR;sd ekg dh 10 rkjh[k dks viuh mifLFkfr ntZ djk;sxkA lacaf/kr Fkkukf/kdkjh mldh mifLFkfr dk fooj.k izR;sd ekg fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa izLrqr djsxkA vfHk;qDr }kjk mDr 'krZ dh ikyuk ugha djus ij fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd vfHk;qDr ds tekur fujLrhdj.k ds laca/k esa izkFkZuki= izLrqr djus dks Lora= jgsaxsA

¶29

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶30

VISHAL SHARMA /05

Hari Singh S/O Shri Mausariya v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hari Singh S/O Shri Mausariya v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

1/1. Kamla Devi W/O Late Rajendra Kumar Vs Bhagirath S/O Hardevram

Mukesh Kumar Vs Yashwant Kumar and Another

M/S Ingenium Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Zuberi Engineering Construction Pvt. Ltd.

Nabi Khan S/O Shri Hasan Khan, Vs Nawab Khan S/O Shri Chander Khan

Habeeb Khan Son of Shri Rafiq Vs Manoj Kumar Medatwal Son of Shri Sohan Lal

Mohd. Allauddin Mia @ Munna Ali S/O Shri Mohd. Rafquie Mia Vs the State of Rajasthan