Allowed

Pawan Saini @ Monu S/O Hemraj Sini v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Nov 2025CRLMB/13529/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application filed by petitioner against FIR for offences under BNS and Arms Act. Court granted bail on grounds of parity as co-accused was already released and trial would take considerable time.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed on furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court.

Pawan Saini @ Monu S/O Hemraj Sini Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:44549]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13529/2025

¶4

Pawan Saini @ Monu S/o Hemraj Sini, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Naieyon Ki Bagichi, Bansur, Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror, At Present Lodge In The Central Jail, Alwar.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP

¶7

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order

¶8

06/11/2025

¶9

The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.131/2025 registered at Police Station Harsora, District-Kotputli-Behror for offences under Sections 324(4), 132 and 109(2) of BNS and Sections 5, 27 and 25(6) of Arms Act.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submitted that the name of the co-accused-Manish Gurjar @ Rahul, has been mentioned in the FIR, and he has already been enlarged on bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court on 08.08.2025. It is further submitted that the present case is one of no injury. Petitioner is behind the bars since 30.06.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed.

[2025:RJ-JP:44549]

[CRLMB-13529/2025]

(2 of 2)

The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence on the ground of parity, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶16

On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

¶17

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner- Pawan Saini @ Monu S/o Hemraj Sini shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.

¶18

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶19

Arun/127

Pawan Saini @ Monu S/O Hemraj Sini v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan Saini @ Monu S/O Hemraj Sini v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shoyab Khan @ Attack S/O Ikramuddin Qureshi Vs the State of Rajasthan

Sarfaraz S/O Pravez Vs State of Rajasthan

Sitaram S/O Dhannalal Vs State of Rajasthan

Vipin Parashar Also Known as Tiger S/O Shri Rajendra Parashar Vs State of Rajasthan

Keshav S/O Madhosingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ravi Kumar Jatav S/O Shri Harchand Vs State of Rajasthan