Petitioner sought bail in a murder FIR where three investigations yielded a negative final report and cognizance was later taken on protest petition. The court granted regular bail without expressing any opinion on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13167/2025
Kuldeep S/o Shri Bhanwar Singh, aged About 45 Years, R/o Uchhain, Presently R/o Neemda Gate, Police Station Atalbandh, Bharatpur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Sewar, Bharatpur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta-PP Mr. Anurodh Chaturvedi
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
17/10/2025
[CRLMB-13167/2025]
(2 of 3)
further submits that the instant case is a case where no direct evidence has been adduced and in the circumstances, the deceased might have expired due to drowning in the water after consuming liquor. Counsel submits that trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner.
4 Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record.
[CRLMB-13167/2025]
(3 of 3)
case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Ashu/237
1 issue framed by the court
Should bail be granted to the petitioner arrested on cognizance under Section 302 IPC despite a negative final report after thrice-conducted investigation?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kuldeep
State of Rajasthan
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
