Allowed

Jitendra Sharma S/O Kamlesh v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Oct 2025CRLMB/12761/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed bail applications for three accused in FIR No. 382/2025 under BNS and IT Act offences, noting the offences were triable by a Magistrate, the accused were in long judicial custody, and the trial would take considerable time. Bail was granted on personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed on furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each.

Jitendra Sharma S/O Kamlesh Vs the State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:42765]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12761/2025

¶4

Jitendra Sharma S/o Kamlesh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Hadamtiya Police Thana Bhawani Madni District Jhalawad (Raj) (At Present Confined At Sub- Jail Bhawani Mandi)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12896/2025 Rahul Yadav S/o Vijay Singh Yadav, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Dhani Binjyawali Kujota Police Station Srunda District Kotputali Bheror (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jhalawad)

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13567/2025 Mohammad Sharif S/o Razak Mohammad, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ward No. 23, Ekta Nagar, Bhawani Mandi Police Station Bhawani Mandi, District Jhalawar (At Present Confined At Sub Jail Bhawani Mandi).

¶16

----Petitioner

¶17

Versus

¶18

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶19

		----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Vivek Yadav Mr. Anish Bhadala Mr. Asad Ul HaqNooree
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal,PP

(2 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:42765]

[CRLMB-12761/2025]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU

¶24

Order

¶25

17/10/2025

¶26

These bail applications have been filed by the petitioners under Section 483 BNSS seeking regular bail in FIR No.382/2025 registered at Police Station Bhawani Mandi, District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Section(s) 318(4), 316(2) and 61(2) of BNS and 66-D of Information Technology Act (Amendment) Act 2008.

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in these cases. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the offence(s) are triable by Magistrate. Learned counsel further submits that there is no transaction in the account and only complaints regarding use of his accounts is there. The petitioners have been in judicial custody since long. The conclusion of the trial will take considerable time, hence the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

¶28

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail applications.

¶29

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the offences are triable by Magistrate, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶30

Accordingly, the bail applications filed under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioners namley 1. Jitendra Sharma S/o Kamlesh , 2. Rahul Yadav S/o Vijay Singh Yadav and 3. Mohammad Sharif S/o Razak Mo-

[2025:RJ-JP:42765]

[CRLMB-12761/2025]

(3 of 3)

hammad shall be released on bail, provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶35

(BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J

¶36

DIKSHA MISHRA /139-140-141

Jitendra Sharma S/O Kamlesh v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra Sharma S/O Kamlesh v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tulsi Ram and Ors. Vs State

Hariom Vs State

Prabhu Dayal @ Munna Vs State of Rajasthan

Dharam Singh Meena S/O Budhram Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Harkesh Meena S/O Shri Batturam Vs State of Rajasthan

Majid S/O Shri Ramjan Vs State of Rajasthan