Allowed

Gafar Urf Shera S/O Shri Mohammad Nawab v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC24 Nov 2025CRLMB/12620/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan granted bail to three accused persons in a criminal case under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita after considering the stage of investigation and the fact that a co-accused had already been released. The court enlarged them on bail subject to furnishing personal bonds and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted; accused to furnish personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Gafar Urf Shera S/O Shri Mohammad Nawab Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:47504]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12133/2025

¶4

Rohit Kumar Mahla S/o Ramsukh Mahla, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Ward No. 8, Bad Ki Dhani Tan Gudagodji, Police Station Gudagodji, District Jhunjhunu. (Raj.) (Presently The Accused Is In Judicial Custody In District Jail Jhunjhunu).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12620/2025 Gafar Urf Shera S/o Shri Mohammad Nawab, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Kithana Police Station Sultana District Jhunjhunu Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu).

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13447/2025 Rohit Kumar S/o Ramesh Kumar Khardiya, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Ward No. 1, Vyapariyon Ka Mohalla, Gudhagodji, Police Station Gudhagodji, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu)

¶16

----Petitioner

¶17

Versus

¶18

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶19

----Respondent

¶20

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta Ms. Shweta Soni For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta, P.P.

¶21

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

Order

[2025:RJ-JP:47504]

[CRLMB-12133/2025]

(2 of 3)

24/11/2025

The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.247/2025 registered at Police Station Gudhagodji District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 324(3), 352, 117(2), 118(1), 109(1) & 61(2) of B.N.S.

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case, they have nothing to do with the alleged offences and they are behind the bars since 12.07.2025, 16.06.2025 & 26.07.2025 respectively. The other co-accused person, namely Mohammad Islam Bhati, has already been granted bail by a co-ordinate bench of this Court. After investigating, charge-sheet has been filed in the matter. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, their further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and they are ready and willing to furnish their bail bonds. Therefore, the bail applications deserve to be allowed.

¶29

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications.

¶30

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record.

¶31

Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

[2025:RJ-JP:47504]

[CRLMB-12133/2025]

(3 of 3)

Therefore, the bail applications are allowed. Accusedpetitioners, namely Rohit Kumar Mahla S/o Ramsukh Mahla, Gafar Urf Shera S/o Shri Mohammad Nawab & Rohit Kumar S/o Ramesh Kumar Khardiya, shall be released on bail, if they are not required in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when they are called upon to do so.

¶36

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶37

SAURABH /38-40

Gafar Urf Shera S/O Shri Mohammad Nawab v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gafar Urf Shera S/O Shri Mohammad Nawab v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harish S/O Vikram Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Balsawroop S/O Bhagwan Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Gautam Meena S/O Shri Harinarayan Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Rohit Kumar S/O Ramesh Kumar Khardiya Vs State of Rajasthan

Shivsunder S/O Ramesh Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Rohit Kumar Mahla S/O Ramsukh Mahla Vs State of Rajasthan