Allowed

Kishor Sharma S/O Ramdayal Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Oct 2025CRLMB/12532/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a second bail application under Section 483 BNSS filed by an accused in an IPC case involving Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, and 471. The court considered the charge-sheet, the fact that the offences are triable by a Magistrate, and the duration of pre-trial custody. Bail was granted with conditions regarding personal attendance at the police station monthly and a prohibition

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each, subject to monthly police station presence and appearance in court.

Kishor Sharma S/O Ramdayal Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:42625]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2^nd Bail Application No. 12532/2025

¶4

Kishor Sharma S/o Ramdayal Sharma, Aged About 37 Years, R/o House No. 08, Gali No. 07, Poonam Colony, Nahar Ke Pass, Police Station Railway Colony Kota, District Kota. (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Nirmal Kumar Sharma
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	N.S. Dhakar, PP with
	Mr.	Gaurav Gupta,Assistant GA

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

¶11

Order

¶12

17/10/2025

¶13

This second bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.36/2024 registered at Police Station Kaladera, District Jaipur Rural (Raj.) for offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468 & 471 of IPC.

¶14

The first bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn by this court vide order dated 26.08.2025 while giving liberty to renew the prayer for bail after submission of result of investigation. Now, charge-sheet has been filed thus, this second bail application has been preferred.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. It is contended that trial will

(2 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:42625]

[CRLMB-12532/2025]

take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since 04.08.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and submits that two other cases have been registered against the petitioner. It is submitted that there is specific allegation against the petitioner of getting loan on the basis of forged documents and same has not been repaid by him. 5. I have considered the contentions.

¶21

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by both the parties, especially considering the material available on record in the form of charge-sheet, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the second bail application.

¶22

This second bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Kishor Sharma S/o Ramdayal Sharma, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

(3 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:42625]

[CRLMB-12532/2025]

However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in similar offence(s) during currency of bail granted by this Court. The petitioner is further directed to mark his presence in the concerned police station in first week of every month, till trial is concluded.

¶27

Concerned SHO shall enter the attendance of the petitioner in the Roznamcha. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard.

¶28

If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to petitioner by this Court.

¶29

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance.

¶30

The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶31

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J

¶32

GAUTAM JAIN /14

Kishor Sharma S/O Ramdayal Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kishor Sharma S/O Ramdayal Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijaypal S/O Shree Ganeshram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Kaluram @ Kalu Sharma S/O Ramprasad Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Manish Suman S/O Kailashchand Vs State of Rajasthan

Swarnjeet Singh S/O Shri Harbhajan Vs State of Rajasthan

Varun Kumar S/O Sh. Shailendra Vs State of Rajasthan

Ravindra Singh @ Binno S/O Lalaram Vs State of Rajasthan