Regular bail application by three young men with no criminal antecedents, in custody since 02.09.2025 for offences under the BNS. Court allowed bail subject to personal bond and sureties, without commenting on merits.
Accused-applicants enlarged on bail on personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:41997]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
(At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).
----Applicants
Versus
State of Rajasthan through PP
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Likayat Khan Mr. Vafik Choudhary |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Anirudh Singh |
| Ms. Arti Sharma, PP | |
| Mr. SanjayKhan |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment
14/10/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:41997]
[CRLMB-12323/2025]
(2 of 2)
there is no injury qua gunshot as alleged in the FIR as well as in the statements tendered during the proceedings, moreover, no specific allegations qua head injury is assigned to the accused. It is further submitted that they are the sole bread earner of the family.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
JKP/325
1 issue framed by the court
Whether accused-applicants arrested under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) and 125 of BNS in FIR No. 105/2025 should be enlarged on bail.
5 provisions across 2 enactments
Samsher S/o Himmat
Vajib S/o Mubin
Aalim S/o Rahmat
State of Rajasthan through PP
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
