Allowed

Rijwan S/O Safrudin v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Sept 2025CRLMB/11793/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the applicant-accused Rijwan under Section 483 BNSS in a deadly assault case where the injury was attributed to another person. The court found him no longer required for investigation as co-accused were already released. Bail granted with a personal bond and conditions.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount, subject to specific conditions.

Rijwan S/O Safrudin Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:38112]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11793/2025

¶4

Rijwan S/o Safrudin, R/o Hanotiya, Police Station Suket. (Presently Confined In District Jail Kota)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aman Ali For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN

¶11

Order

¶12

17/09/2025

¶13

The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Rijwan S/o Safrudin seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.112/2025 dated 17.04.2025 registered at P.S. Suket, District - Kota, for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 189(2) of BNS.

¶14

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time.

(2 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:38112]

[CRLMB-11793/2025]

Learned counsel for applicant submits that co-accused Monu @ Juber and Tinu @ Sameer were already granted bail by this Court on 03.09.2025 and case of present applicant is identical with them. He further submits that the attribution deadly assault is made upon Shahrukh.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature.

¶20

Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties.

¶21

On 03.09.2025, this Court has considered bail application of Monu @ Juber and Tinu @ Sameer and granted bail under Section 483 of BNSS to them. The material on record indicate that specific attribution of grievous injury upon injured Ashiq is assigned to Shahrukh and noticing the same in order dated 03.09.2025, we have granted bail to Monu @ Juber and Tinu @ Sameer and case of present applicant is identical with them.

¶22

Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicantaccused.

[2025:RJ-JP:38112]

[CRLMB-11793/2025]

(3 of 3)

Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicantaccused Rijwan S/o Safrudin , is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:-

¶27

(i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner.

¶28

(ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law.

¶29

(iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court.

¶30

(iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled.

¶31

The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail.

¶32

(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J

¶33

GAURAV /32

Rijwan S/O Safrudin v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rijwan S/O Safrudin v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunder Singh S/O Shri Megh Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Manoharlal S/O Ramjilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Imran Alias Beda S/O Aasar Qureshi Vs State of Rajasthan

Raju Yadav S/O Shri Bhanwar Lal Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Manish Singh Shekhawat S/O Harisingh Shekhawat Vs State of Rajasthan

Sabir S/O Jormal @ Juhru Vs State of Rajasthan