Allowed

Mulkraj S/O Ramswaroop v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC11 Sept 2025CRLMB/11426/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second bail application for regular bail in an FIR alleging an attempt to murder police personnel by driving a Scorpio vehicle. Earlier bail was rejected on merits; all seven key witnesses have since been examined and the trial will take time. Bail granted subject to bonds and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Accused ordered to be enlarged on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two reliable sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, subject to appearance conditions.

Mulkraj S/O Ramswaroop Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:36800]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 11426/2025

¶4

Mulkraj S/o Ramswaroop, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Bidarkya Ki Dhani Tan Papadda, Police Station Papadda, District Dausa. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Dausa)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Judgment / Order

¶12

11/09/2025

¶13

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk dh /kkjk 483 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk&yok.k] nkSlk esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 27@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 109¼1½] 132] 3¼5½ ch-,u-,l- o /kkjk 3@25 vk;q/k vf/kfu;e esa is’k fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk fuosnu gS fd vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] fdlh Hkh vkgr ds dksbZ pksV dkfjr ugha gqbZ gS] fnukad 28-05-2025 dks izFke tekur vkosnu [kkfjt djrs le; egRoiw.kZ xokgku ds c;ku gksus ds mijkar uohu vkosnu is'k djus dh Lora=rk nh xbZ Fkh] vc ifjoknh lfgr dqy 7 egRoiw.kZ xokgku ds c;ku gks pqds gSa] vfHk;qDr fnukad 12-03-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] 'ks"k fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

[2025:RJ-JP:36800]

[CRLMB-11426/2025]

(2 of 2)

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk] vfHk;qDr ds nqLlkgl rFkk vkijkf/kd fjdkWMZ dks ns[krs gq, ;g tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶19

nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶20

orZeku ekeys esa iqfyldfeZ;ksa ij LdkWfiZ;ks xkM+h p<+kdj mudh gR;k dkfjr djus ds iz;kl dk vkjksi izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ij gS] iwoZ esa mlds vkijkf/kd fjdkWMZ dks ns[krs gq, tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;k x;k Fkk] mlds i'pkr~ yxHkx lHkh egRoiw.kZ xokgku ds c;ku gks pqds gSaA vfHk;qDr fnukad 12-03-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] 'ks"k fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA

¶21

vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] cnyh gqbZ ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶22

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr eqydjkt iq= jkeLo:i dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶23

fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks ;g funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gS fd vfHk;qDr }kjk tekur lqfo/kk izkIr djus ds ckn fopkj.k esa tkucw>dj ck/kk dkfjr dh tkrh gS ;k vuko';d LFkxu ekaxs tkrs gSa] rks rRdky bl U;k;ky; dks lwfpr fd;k tkos rkfd vfHk;qDr dks nh xbZ tekur lqfo/kk dks fujLr djus ij fopkj fd;k tk ldsxkA

¶24

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶25

DINESH KUMAWAT /06

Mulkraj S/O Ramswaroop v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mulkraj S/O Ramswaroop v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Gyarsi Devi and Another Vs Gopal

Mukesh @ Rakesh Vs Nandkishore S/O Late Natwarlal Choudhary Mahajan

Rajuram S/O Durgaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Iqbal S/O Late Mohiyuddin Khan Vs Nijamuddin S/O Late Mohiyuddin

Sushil Chowdhary S/O Late Sh. Ramnath Chowdhary, Vs Champa Devi W/O Late Sh. Jagdish

Uco Bank Vs Koshalya Devi Wife of Shri Sunderlal Jetwani