Allowed

Ankit S/O Ramrup v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Oct 2025CRLMB/11152/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed a bail application filed by two accused persons (Ankit and Chetan) involved in a criminal case, observing that the accused are awaiting trial and will appear for bail pendency.

What did the court decide?

Granted bail to the accused persons and recorded the same. The accused are to be brought on bail if there is an alternative order; otherwise, they remain at large pending further orders.

Ankit S/O Ramrup Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:40873]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11152/2025

¶4

Ankit S/o Ramrup, R/o Gram Delunda, Police Station Raithal, District Bundi (Raj.). (Accused Confined In District Jail At Bundi).

¶5

Chetan S/o Rambharos, R/o Gram Jhaliji Ka Barana, Police Station Gendoli, District Bundi (Raj.). (Accused Confined In District Jail At Bundi)

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP Mr. Govind Lal Choudhary, Adv.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order

¶12

08/10/2025

¶13

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk xs.Mksyh] cwUnh esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 56@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 189¼2½] 115¼2½] 126¼2½] 110 ch-,u-,l- esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k us rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gS] mUgsa feF;k :i ls fyIr fd;k x;k gS] os yacs le; ls vfHkj{kk esa gSa] izdj.k esa vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gS] fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj mUgsa tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkosA

[CRLMB-11152/2025]

[2025:RJ-JP:40873]

(2 of 3)

ifjoknh ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd rFkk fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk fuosnu gS fd vkgr ds 'kjhj ij dqy 13 pksVsa dkfjr gqbZ gSa] mDr lexz :i ls izk.kk?kkrd izd`fr dh crk;h x;h gSa] vr% vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, ;g tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶19

nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶20

orZeku izdj.k esa vkgr eqdqV fcgkjh ds 'kjhj ij 13 pksVsa vkuk crk;k x;k gS] eqdqV fcgkjh us /kkjk 183 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds c;kuksa esa jksfgr 'kekZ }kjk dqYgkM+h ls vkSj fuf[ky eh.kk }kjk yksgs dh iEih ls flj ij ekjuk crk;k gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k us eqdqV fcgkjh ds 'kjhj ds ekfeZd Hkkx ij dksbZ pksV igqapk;h gks] ,slk rF; i=koyh ij ugha vk;k gSA ;|fi izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr vafdr ds fo:) iwoZ esa nks vkijkf/kd izdj.k rFkk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr psru ds fo:) iwoZ esa ,d vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ jgk gS] rFkkfi izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k yacs le; ls vfHkj{kk esa gaS] izdj.k esa vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gS] fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA

¶21

vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa

¶22

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶23

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr 1- vafdr iq= jke:i 2- psru iq= jkeHkjksl dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mUgsa cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq izR;sd }kjk ,d yk[k :i;s dk

¶24

[2025:RJ-JP:40873] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11152/2025]

¶25

cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkosa rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mUgsa gLrxr izdj.k esa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶26

(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J

¶27

MANISH SAINI /119 (8)

Ankit S/O Ramrup v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ankit S/O Ramrup v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Kumar S/O Sheetalram Jangid Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt Asha Kumari W/O Late Sh. Birdhilal Nagar Vs State of Rajasthan

Mubeen S/O Ismail Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra Sharma S/O Late Shri Shyamlal Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra Singh S/O Nanak Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Bijendra Singh S/O Lal Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan