Allowed

Amit Kumar Urf Mangodi S/O Shri Ashok Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Sept 2025CRLMB/11108/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 483 BNSS in an FIR for offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 189(2), 351(2) and 303(2) of the BNS. Injuries to the injured were simple; trial likely to take time. Bail granted with conditions including monthly police-station presence.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on personal bond Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each, subject to monthly police-station appearance and other conditions.

Amit Kumar Urf Mangodi S/O Shri Ashok Kumar Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:36214]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11108/2025

¶4

Amit Kumar Urf Mangodi S/o Shri Ashok Kumar, R/o Chhatriyon Ke Pass Nayabas, Police Station Neemkathana Kotwali, District Sikar, Raj. (At Present Petitioner Confined At District Jail Jhunjhunu).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	K.K. Bhinda
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	N.S. Dhakar, PP with
	Mr.	Gaurav Gupta,Asstt. G.A.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

¶11

Order

¶12

09/09/2025

¶13

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.241/2025 registered at Police Station Udaipur Wati, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 189(2), 351(2) & 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that all the injuries sustained to injured are simple in nature. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since 12.08.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.

(2 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:36214]

[CRLMB-11108/2025]

Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. He submits that one another case has been registered against the petitioner which shows that petitioner has criminal mentality. However, he fairly conceded the fact that the injuries sustained to the injured are simple in nature.

¶19

I have considered the contentions.

¶20

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that injuries sustained to the injured are simple in nature; trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application.

¶21

This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Amit Kumar Urf Mangodi S/o Shri Ashok Kumar shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station.

[2025:RJ-JP:36214]

[CRLMB-11108/2025]

(3 of 3)

Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard.

¶27

If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court.

¶28

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance.

¶29

The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶30

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J

¶31

LALIT MOHAN /121

Amit Kumar Urf Mangodi S/O Shri Ashok Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Kumar Urf Mangodi S/O Shri Ashok Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shahid S/O Jahid Vs State of Rajasthan

Ugmaram S/O Jaisaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra @ Surya S/O Shri Kalulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhagchand S/O Omprakash Vs the State of Rajasthan

Dinesh Barala S/O Prahalad Barala Vs the State of Rajasthan

Hansram @ Hansa S/O Munsi Vs State of Rajasthan