The Rajasthan High Court dismissed this bail application, partially relying on the Supreme Court's 29-07-2025 order upholding the rejection of Special Leave to Appeal No. 6522/2025. The release was conditioned upon fixing counsel fees.
Petitioner released on bail against the State under specified conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:34883]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 4th Bail Application No. 11062/2025
Laxminarayan S/o Purilal, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Bheelwada, Police Station Sadar Jhalawar, District Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail, Jhalawar).
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghuraj Singh Rajawat Mr. Sanju Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order
01/09/2025
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g prqFkZ tekur izkFkZuk i= Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk dh /kkjk 483 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk& >kyjkikVu] ftyk& >kykokM+ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 313@2023 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 419] 120&ch Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa is”k fd;k x;k gSA
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku~ vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks izdj.k esa >wBk lac) fd;k x;k gSA izdj.k esa vU; lgvfHk;qDr /kUukyky dh tekur ;kfpdk ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 6522/2025 vkns'k fnukad 29-07-2025 ds ek/;e ls bl vk/kkj ij Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS fd izdj.k esa vfHk;ksx i= lacaf/kr U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr gks pqdk gS vkSj izdj.k esa vfHk;kstu i{k ds 25 xokg lwphc) gSa] ftuesa ls ek= ,d xokg ds c;ku gq, gSaA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fnukad 02-02-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gS ,oa izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa yack le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk izdj.k vU; lgvfHk;qDr /kUukyky ds izdj.k ls fHkUurk j[krs gq, ugha gSA
[2025:RJ-JP:34883]
[CRLMB-11062/2025]
(2 of 2)
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo#) vkjksfir vijk/k eftLVªsV }kjk fopkj.kh; gSA vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk,A
fo}ku~ yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;k x;kA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr }kjk vU; lgvfHk;qDr ds lkFk feydj ;g tkurs gq, fd mDr laifÙk foØsrk dh ugha gS] mDr laifÙk dks [kjhn fd;k x;k gS vkSj bl izdkj dwVjfpr nLrkostkr ds vk/kkj ij laifÙk [kjhn dh xbZ gS] izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr eq[; ykHkkFkhZ gSA izdj.k esa vkjksi xaHkhj gSaA vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk prqFkZ tekur vkosnu vLohdkj fd;k tk,A
cgl lquh xbZA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.kksa ij bl izØe ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;k tkuk visf{kr ugha gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fnukad 02-02-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gS ,oa izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa yack le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA izdj.k esa vU; lgvfHk;qDr /kUukyky dh tekur ;kfpdk ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk vkns'k fnukad 29-07-2025 ds }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gSA vr% mijksDr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, eSa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk prqFkZ tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd, tkus ;ksX; le>rk gw¡A
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr y{ehukjk;.k iq= iwjhyky dh vksj ls izLrqr prqFkZ tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns”k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls ryc fd;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj #i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o iPphl&iPphl gtkj #i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo”oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko”;drk u gks] rks vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
MOHIT/ 17
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted given the petitioner's non-bailable offence charge, presence in judicial custody since 02-02-2025, and pending challengeto anRCCounsel appointment order.
Laxminarayan S/o Purilal
The State Of Rajasthan
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
