The court condoned the delay in filing a criminal leave to appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The matter was listed for further proceedings.
Delay in filing the Crml. Leave to Appeal was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 189/2024
State Of Rajasthan
----Appellant
Versus
Mittu Singh
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Aneesh Bhurat, PP with Mr. CP Marwan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
28/05/2024
Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate puts-in-appearance on behalf of the sole-respondent, therefore, service is complete.
Heard on application (01/2024) filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the present Crml. Leave to Appeal.
For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. Delay in filing the present Crml. Leave to Appeal is hereby condoned.
List the matter on 13.08.2024, as prayed.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
37-GKaviya/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the criminal leave to appeal is condonable under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State Of Rajasthan
Mittu Singh
Manoj Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
