A juvenile and a co-accused sought bail in a murder case arising from FIR 228/2024. The court held that a compromise cannot secure bail for the juvenile in a heinous offence under Section 302 IPC, and prolonged incarceration alone did not justify bail for the adult accused; both petitions were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 146/2025
Child Conflict With Law S (At Present Petitioner Is Under The Detention Of Children Observation Home Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 5/2025
Arjunram Jat Son Of Jayram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Mundelo Ka Mohalla Khiyala Tehsil Jayal P.s. Jayal District Nagour Present Hotel Sunshine And Arjun Palace Rajat Path Mansarovar P.s. Mansarovar Jaipur (Accused At Present Confined In Jail Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Yadav Ms. Nidhi Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, AGA-cum-PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order
13/02/2025
same CCL “S” was dismissed on 12.07.2024. Similarly, S.B.
[CRLR-146/2025]
(2 of 4)
Criminal Appeal No. 784/2024 on behalf of Arjunram Jat for bail was also dismissed on 12.07.2024.
[CRLR-146/2025]
(3 of 4)
S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 5/2025
(4 of 4) [CRLR-146/2025]
on bail just on the ground that in last 10-11 months, the trial court has not recorded any statement.
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 146/2025
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J
Chetna/3-4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the juvenile CCL charged under Sections 302, 201 and 120B IPC was entitled to bail under Section 12 of the JJ Act notwithstanding a compromise with the complainant.
Whether the accused Arjunram Jat, in custody 10-11 months without commencement of trial, was entitled to bail given the gravity of charges.
5 provisions across 4 enactments
Child Conflict With Law S
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
Arjunram Jat
Pintu Son Of Kishore Jonwal
Ashok Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
