investigation officer, has also accepted in his cross-examination that it is true that in the statements of the victims Ex.D/1 & Ex.D/2, they did not mention about kidnapping. Further, P.W. 2 – victim No. 1, has accepted in her cross-examination that when they were going on the motorcycle, they came across the town of Nawgaon on the way. In Naugaon town, many people were going on the road and there was also movement of vehicles and at that time landlord was present there and people lived in the neighbourhood of that room. However, there is no evidence on record that victims made any complaint or raised any alarm or tried to escape from the custody of accused. In the opinion of this Court, if the victims were forcibly kidnapped and subjected to sexual assault by the accused-appellants, then they would have certainly resisted and informed about incident to the persons available at those places, which was not done by them, which raises suspicion on their version. 28. It is also pertinent to note that in the case at hand P.W. 1 victim No. 2 has admitted in her cross-examination that there was no kitchen in the house, there was no provision of water, there was no water in the toilet. P.W. 18 - Deepak Kumar, the Investigation Officer, has also admitted in his cross-examination that House No. FF 438 shown in the site plan of the place of occurrence (Ex.P/17 & Ex.P/18), there was neither any household goods nor furniture, House No. FF 438 was not locked, it was open. As per the prosecution story, the victim were stated to be stayed there for 5-6 days. Thus, in our considered opinion, under normal circumstances, it is not possible for a person to stay for 5- 6 days in a house, where there are no household goods, furniture,
