Appellant sought restoration of a first appeal dismissed for failure to comply with a peremptory order regarding office-flagged defects. Counsel undertook to cure the defects, and the restoration application was allowed with the appeal restored to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:41983]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 364/2024
In
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 429/2022
Gopal Lal Agarwal Son of Late Shri Ramjeevan Agarwal, Aged About 70 Years, Resident of 2787, Purani Basti, Bagru Valo Ka Rasta, Hari Jethi Ka Chowk,. Jaipur and Office Agrawal College, Jaipur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raunak Singhvi For Respondent(s) :
(2 of 2)
[2025:RJ-JP:41983]
[CRES-364/2024]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
14/10/2025
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
NITIN /14
1 issue framed by the court
Should the first appeal dismissed for non-compliance with a peremptory order be restored?
Gopal Lal Agarwal
Smt. Chandra Bhaga
Dinesh Kumar
Deepak
Naresh Kumar Agarwal
Mukesh Agarwal
Sudesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
