Restoration application seeking revival of a civil miscellaneous appeal dismissed earlier. The court allowed the application and restored the appeal to its original number subject to payment of costs, with automatic dismissal if the cost is not deposited within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:38303]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 180/2015
IN
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.400/2002
Union of India
----Petitioner
| Versus | ||
|---|---|---|
| M/s Sethi Construction | Company, Government | Contractor, |
| Gumanpura, Kota (Raj.) | ||
| --- | -Respondent | |
| For Petitioner(s) : |
Mr. Jai Prakash for Mr. Divyesh Maheshwari |
|
| For Respondent(s) : |
Ms. Meenal Bhargava |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI
Order
18/09/2025
Heard on prayer for restoration.
Upon due consideration and cause shown in the application, the application is allowed.
Accordingly, S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.400/2002 is restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs.5,000/-, to be deposited with the Litigation Welfare Fund, Jaipur within a period of two weeks, failing which the present restoration application shall stand dismissed automatically without further reference to the Court.
Office to proceed further.
Ms. Meenal Bhargava, learned counsel enters appearance on behalf of the respondent-M/s Sethi Construction Company.
[2025:RJ-JP:38303]
[CRES-180/2015]
(2 of 2)
Office is directed to show the name of Ms. Meenal Bhargava
in the cause list as counsel for the respondent.
Service is treated as complete.
(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J
GAURAV SHARMA /11
Union of India
M/s Sethi Construction Company, Government Contractor, Gumanpura, Kota (Raj.)
Chandra Prakash Shrimali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
