The court condoned a 122-day delay in filing a civil restoration application, subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000, to restore a second appeal for hearing on merits rather than dismissal in default.
Delay condoned; Second Appeal restored for admission subject to payment of Rs. 2,000 cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:45119]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 178/2025 In
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 229/2023
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Santosh Kumar Jain
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order
10/11/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:45119]
[CRES-178/2025]
(2 of 2)
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
pcg/31
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 122 days in filing the restoration application should be condoned?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Rani Rathore
Kumari Yuvika
Vivan Rathore
Smt. Premlata Rathore
Vijendra Singh Rathore
Sudeesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
