The High Court at Jodhpur allowed a restoration application filed against an order dismissing an appeal for non-filing of PF and notices. The Court held that service on Respondent No. 2 was complete based on a filing by his counsel.
The restoration application is allowed and the appeal is restored to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JD:2436]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration No. 108/2022
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.K. Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jagdish Vyas
(2 of 2)
[2025:RJ-JD:2436]
[CRES-108/2022]
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
14/01/2025
(REKHA BORANA),J
193-T.Singh/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present application for restoration of the appeal is maintainable after non-filing of specific notices.
Whether service on Respondent No. 2 is deemed complete to allow restoration of the appeal.
Preeti W/o Late Rupesh
Riddhim S/o Late Rupesh
Ridhi D/o Late Rupesh
Asha W/o Late Ramswaroop
Ramswaroop S/o Late Pukhraj
Satyanarayan S/o Shri Khivraj
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
