Dismissed

Tejram S/O Shri Raghunath, v. Dharmveer Yadav S/O Shri Hemraj Yadav

Rajasthan HC15 Sept 2025CR/377/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Tenants' revision challenged the Rent Tribunal's rejection of their Order VII Rule 11 CPC application seeking rejection of the plaint. Relying on Supreme Court precedent that only plaint averments and documents can be considered, the High Court found the objections raised mixed questions of fact and law and dismissed the revision.

What the court decided

AI extract

Tejram S/O Shri Raghunath, Vs Dharmveer Yadav S/O Shri… — Landlord and Tenant | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:37338]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 377/2024

¶4

Tejram S/o Shri Raghunath, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Maator, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar (Raj.)

¶5

Daulat Ram S/o Shri Tejram, Aged About 41 Years, Maator, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar (Raj.)

¶6

Smt. Mishro W/o Shri Todarmal Saini, Aged About 42 Years, D/o Late Shri Lalaram, R/o Randaka Baas, Gram Maator, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar (Raj.).

¶7

Smt Saroj W/o Shri Daulat Ram, D/o Late Shri Lalaram Mali, Aged About 45 Years, Randaka Baas, Gram Maator, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar (Raj.)

¶8

----Petitioners

¶9

Versus

¶10

Dharmveer Yadav S/o Shri Hemraj Yadav, Shopkeeper Tenant- In Front Of Chhaju Singh Ki Gali, Baal Niketan Bhawan, Malakheda Darwaje Bahar, Alwar City, Alwar (Raj.)

¶11

Nagar Nigam, Alwar Through Commissioner, Nagar Nigam Alwar.

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samarth Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Yadav, Adv.

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶15

Judgment / Order

¶16

15/09/2025

¶17

;kphXk.k dh vksj ls ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fo}ku fdjk;k vf/kdj.k] vyoj }kjk vthZ la[;k 34@45@24 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 21-10-2024 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh gS ftlds ek/;e ls ;kphx.k dk vkosnu vUrxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- [kkfjt fd;k x;kA

¶18

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph rFkk v;kph i{k dh cgl lquh] vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶19

;kph i{k dh vksj ls vUrxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr vkosnu is'k dj ;g vkifRr yh fd oknxzLr lEifRr ds laca/k esa iwoZ esa

[2025:RJ-JP:37338]

[CR-377/2024]

(2 of 2)

izLrqr okn la[;k 50@2018 okfil fy;s tkus ls fu.khZr gks pqdk gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa /kkjk 11 lh-ih-lh- ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj ;g i'pkrorhZ vthZ ¼vkosnu½ pyus ;ksX; ugha gSA v;kph dh vksj ls okn dkj.k o okn dh fo"k; oLrq vkfn vyx gksuk crkrs gq, vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- dk vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k] ftl ij vk{ksfir vkns'k ds ek/;e ls ;kph i{k dh vksj ls izLrqr vkosnu vUrxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- [kkfjt fd;k x;kA

¶24

ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Eldeco Housing and Industries Ltd. Vs. Ashok Vidyarthi and Ors. (2024) 11 SCC 503 o Soumitra Kumar Sen Vs. Shyamal Kumar Sen & Ors. (2018) 5 SCC 644 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds vkosnu ij fopkj djrs le; ek= oknh ds vfHkdFkuksa o okni= ds lkFk izLrqr nLrkostksa ij gh fopkj fd;k tk ldrk gSA

¶25

mijksDr fof/kd O;oLFkk ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;s tkus ls Li"V gS fd ek= vthZ ¼vkosnu½ esa of.kZr vfHkdFkuks a ds vk/kkj ij vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- dk vkosnu Lohdkj ;ksX; ugha gSA ;kph dh vksj ls tks vkifRr;ka yh x;h gSa] os rF;ksa o fof/k dk fefJr iz'u gaS rFkk fy;s x;s vk{ksi@vkifRr;ka vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- dh ifjf/k esa ugha vkrs gSaA

¶26

mijksDr foospu ls Li"V gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k iw.kZr% rF;ksa o fof/k ds vuq:i gS] mlesa dksbZ vfu;ferrk ;k voS/kkfudrk ugha gSA

¶27

ifj.kker% ;[email protected] dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk vLohdkj dj [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 21-10-2024 dh iqf"V dh tkrh gS] LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh blh vuqlkj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA

¶28

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶29

Mittal /29

Tejram S/O Shri Raghunath, v. Dharmveer Yadav S/O Shri Hemraj Yadav

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Tejram S/O Shri Raghunath, v. Dharmveer Yadav S/O Shri Hemraj Yadav

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shankarlal Sharma Son of Late Shri Ram Gopal Sharma(Since Deceased) Vs Smt. Annpurna Sharma Alias Pinki, Wife of Shri Kailash Chandra Sharma, D/O Shri Shankar Lal Sharma

Khemchand Yadav S/O Shri Godaram Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Iqbal S/O Late Mohiyuddin Khan Vs Nijamuddin S/O Late Mohiyuddin

Bhanwar Lal Vs Prabhu Dayal

Chandra Shekhar S/O Shri Mahaveer Prasad, Vs Pankaj Pujari S/O Raghunath Prasad

Tejram S/O Shri Raghunath Vs Bhagwan Das S/O Shri Radhey Shyam