Civil revision petition challenging an order u/s 7 Rule 11 CPC dismissing a plaint regarding land encumbrance under Rajasthan Encumbered Estates Act. High Court dismissed the revision petition, affirming the lower court's order as legally correct and distinguishing the cited precedent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:44132]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 120/2025
Nasreen Bano W/o Javed Kureshi, Aged About 34 Years, R/o C- 30, Bilal Masjid Road, Bhatta Basti, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahendra Sharma, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
03/11/2025
;kph&izfroknh Øe&1 }kjk ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fo}ku vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k] nkarkjkex<+] ftyk&lhdj }kjk nhokuh okn la[;k&37@2024 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 20-03-2025 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh] ftlds ek/;e ls izfroknh Øe&2 dk vkosnu varxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- [kkfjt fd;k x;kA
[2025:RJ-JP:44132]
[CR-120/2025]
(2 of 3)
fo}ku vf/koDrk izfroknh Øe&2 dk ;g fuosnu gS fd okn izLrqfr ds le; oknxzlr Hkwfe dh oknh;k [kkrsnkj ugha Fkh] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa tc rd mlds [kkrsnkjh vf/kdkj jktLo U;k;ky; }kjk ?kksf"kr ugha fd;k tkos] rc rd orZeku okn iks"k.kh; ugha gSA vius rdksZa ds leFkZu esa U;kf;d fu.kZ; Pyarelal Vs. Shubhendra Pilania 2019 SCC Online SC 98 izLrqr djrs gq, ;g rdZ fn;k fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk vk{ksfir vkns'k rF;ksa o fof/k ds foijhr gS] vr% vk{ksfir vkns'k vikLr dj mudk vkosnu varxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- Lohdkj fd;k tkos rFkk okn ukeatwj fd;k tkosA
blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk v;kph&oknh dk fuosnu gS fd orZeku ekeys esa oknh;k ds [kkrsnkjh vf/kdkj dHkh Hkh fookfnr ugha jgs gSa] oknxzLr nLrkost dks fujLr djus dk vuU; {ks=kf/kdkj flfoy U;k;ky; dks gS] var esa ;g ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus rFkk vk{ksfir vkns'k dh iqf"V fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
orZeku ekeys esa ;g fooknjfgr gS fd okn esa of.kZr df"k Hkwfe esa 1@2 fgLlk oknh;k Jherh eSuk dk FkkA oknh;k dk ;g vfHkdFku gS fd izfroknh Øe&1 tkosn us mlds vR;f/kd vk;q o vLoLFk gksus dh fLFkfr dk ykHk mBkrs gq, diViwoZd ,d eq[R;kjukek fnukad 05-07-2024 dks fu"ikfnr djok fy;k vkSj mlds vk/kkj ij viuh iRuh izfroknh Øe&2 ds i{k esa ;g df"k Hkwfe varfjr dj nhA
tgka oknh ds [kkrsnkjh vf/kdkj fookfnr vFkok lansgxzLr gks] rks ,slh fLFkfr esa /kkjk 88 jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e ds rgr ?kks"k.kk dk okn jktLo U;k;ky; }kjk laKs; gS vkSj /kkjk 207 ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj flfoy U;k;ky; dk {ks=kf/kdkj oftZr gks tkrk gSA orZeku ekeys esa fookfnr nLrkost fu"ikfnr gksus ls iwoZ oknh;k dk bl d`f"k Hkwfe esa vf/kdkj fufoZokn jgk gS] vr% ;g okn iw.kZr% o 'kq)r% fookfnr nLrkost dks fujLr djokus ds laca/k esa gSA
(3 of 3) [CR-120/2025]
[2025:RJ-JP:44132]
fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr fu.kZ; Pyarelal Vs. Shubhendra Pilania ¼iwoksZDr½ orZeku ekeys esa rF;ksa esa fHkUurk ds dkj.k ls ykxw ugha gksrk gSA fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk lHkh rF;ksa o fof/k ds izko/kkuksa dks lE;d :i ls fopkj esa ysus ds mijkar vk{ksfir vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gS] ftlesa dksbZ vfu;ferrk ;k voS/kkfudrk ugha gS] ,slh fLFkfr esa vk{ksfir vkns'k iq"V gksus rFkk ;g ;kfpdk [kkfjt gksus ;ksX; gSA
ifj.kker% ;kph&izfroknh Øe&1 dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 20-03-2025 dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA LFkxu vkosnu o vU; vkosnu] ;fn dksbZ yafcr gksa] rks os Hkh mDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;s tkrs gSaA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
DINESH KUMAWAT /20
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the order under challenge was justified under the law?
Whether the distinction from Pyarelal Vs. Shubhendra Pilania applies?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Pyarelal Vs. Shubhendra PilaniaDistinguished¶29
Pyarelal Vs. Shubhendra Pilania 2019 SCC Online SC 98 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Nasreen Bano
Maina
Javed Kureshi
Mohammad Yunus
Nabaab Kureshi
State Of Rajasthan
UMA SHANKER VYAS
DINESH KUMAWAT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
