Civil miscellaneous appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as no appellant appeared to prosecute the appeal on multiple listed dates including the day of order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:36219]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 901/2004
¼1½ cjdr [kka iq= ihj [ka vk;q 49 o"kZ
¼2½ uwj tgka ifRu Jh cjdr [kka vk;q 44 o"kZ fuoklh x.k xzke djojh [kqnZ rglhy fd’ku xat ftyk ckajk ¼jkt0½
----vihykFkhZ
Versus
¼1½ yk[ku flag iq= lksuk] fuoklh jaxiqj jksM] dksVk ta- dksVk ¼jkt0½& pkyd feuh cl uacj vkj0ts0&20]ih&3372
¼2½ ;qojkt fd’kksj iq= y{ehpUn] fuoklh jaxiqj jksM] dksVk tad’ku] dksVk ¼jkt0½& ekfyd feuh cl uacj vkj0ts0&20] ih& 3372 ¼3½ U;w bafM;k ,’;ksjsUl dEiuh fyfeVsM] dksVk ¼jkt0½
----izR;FkhZ
For Appellant(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhanu Prakash Verma for Mrs. Archana Mantri
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI
Order
09/09/2025
No one is present on behalf of the appellants to prosecute the appeal even on 29.07.2024, 29.04.2025 & 11.08.2025 and today also.
However, in the light of above, appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J
GARIMA /38
Bharat Khan son of Pir Khan
Noor Khan son of Bharat Khan
Lakhan Singh son of Sona
Yuvraj Kishor son of Lakhi Chand
New India Assurance Company Limited, Kota
Chandra Prakash Shrimali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
