Allowed
Mukesh S/O Sh. Bihari Lal v. Sriram Transport Finance Co. Limited
Rajasthan HCCMA/4652/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR…
What the court decided
AI extract
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:30020]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4652/2018
Mukesh S/o Sh. Bihari Lal, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village Batesara Tehsil Ramgarh District Alwar (Raj.)
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Govind Prasad Kaushik, Adv. For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
05/08/2025
vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g vihy fo}ku vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k Øe&5] t;iqj egkuxj t;iqj }kjk vkifRr izkFkZuk i= la[;k&40@2017 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 18-07-2018 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh] ftlds ek/;e ls vihykFkhZ }kjk /kkjk 34 ek/;LFke ,oa lqyg vf/kfu;e] 1996 ¼ftls vkxs ^^vf/kfu;e&1996** dgk tkosxk½ ds rgr izLrqr vkifRr izkFkZuk i= dks vf/kfu;e&1996 dh /kkjk 34¼5½ ds izko/kkuksa dks vkKkid gksuk ekurs gq, o mlds vikyu ds vk/kkj ij [kkfjt fd;k x;kA
izR;FkhZ i{k uksfVl rkehy ds ckotwn mifLFkr ugha gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dks lquk x;kA
[2025:RJ-JP:30020]
(2 of 2) [CMA-4652/2018]
vkifRr izLrqr djus ls iwoZ vf/kfu;e&1996 dh /kkjk 34¼5½ dh ikyuk dks fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vkKkid ekurs gq, xq.k&nks"kksa ij tk;s fcuk vkifRr [kkfjt dh xbZ] tcfd vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkar fcgkj jkT; o vU; cuke fcgkj jkT; Hkwfe fodkl cSad lfefr ¼2018½ 9 ,l-lh-lh- 472 ds ekeys esa vf/kfu;e&1996 dh /kkjk 34¼5½ ds izko/kkuksa dks funsZ'kkRed ekuk gSA
vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa vihyk/khu vkns'k fnukad 18-07-2018 vikLr dj ekeyk fof/kuqlkj lquokbZ o fuLrkj.k gsrq iqu% fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks izfrizsf"kr fd;k tkrk gSA
blh vuqlkj ;g vihy Lohdkj dj fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gSA
dk;kZy; dks funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gS fd vkns'k dh izfr fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks izsf"kr dh tkosA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
DINESH KUMAWAT /38
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court was required to consider Section 34(5) of the Arbitration Act, 1996 before rejecting the application under Section 34.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mukesh S/o Sh. Bihari Lal
Sriram Transport Finance Co. Limited
Sh. Arif Mohammad Madani, Arbitrator
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court