Allowed

Ranjeet Singh v. Mool Singh

Rajasthan HC13 Aug 2025CMA/2391/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a writ appeal challenging an order by the District Judge that permitted one of the transgender appellants to restrict alienation of ancestral property. The Court held there was no legal proof of unsoundness of mind for the other appellant and restricted neither appellant from interfering with the property until the primary suit is decided.

What did the court decide?

Appellants restricted from interfering with, alienating, or creating encumbrances on the ancestral property until the primary suit is decided.

Ranjeet Singh Vs Mool Singh — Property and Title | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:31488]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2391/2025

¶4

Ranjeet Singh, Aged About 25 Years, S/o Prahlad Singh, 2. Smt. Prem Bai W/o Late Gokul Singh, Aged About 80 Years, Both Are Residing At Shyampura Kalan, Tehsil Nirjharna, District Dausa.

¶5

----Appellants

¶6

Versus

¶7

Mool Singh S/o Roop Singh, Aged About 90 Years,

¶8

Chhitar Singh S/o Mool Singh, aged about 48 years,

¶9

Ramsingh S/o Mool Singh[ Aged About 62 Years,

¶10

Sub-Registrar, Nirjharna Office, Tehsil Nirjharna, District Dausa.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Anil Agrawal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Govind Purohit, Adv.

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶14

Judgment / Order

¶15

13/08/2025

¶16

ewy okn ds izfroknh dze&1 o [email protected] ¼ftUgsa vkxs izfroknh dze&1 o 2 dgk tkosxk½ dh vksj ls ;g vihy fo}ku vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k] ykylksV ftyk&nkSlk }kjk nhokuh fofo/k izdj.k la[;k 09@2025 esa ikfjr vihyk/khu vkns'k fnukad 14-05-2025 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh gS ftlds ek/;e ls fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vkns'k 39 fu;e 1 o 2 lh-ih-lh- dk vkosnu vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj djrs gq, nksuksa [email protected] dks vius fgLls dh lEifRr dks ewy okn ds fuLrkj.k rd vfxze cspku djus ls ikcUn fd;k x;k rFkk 'ks"k vuqrks"k vLohdkj fd;s x;sA

[2025:RJ-JP:31488]

[CMA-2391/2025]

(2 of 3)

fo}ku vf/koDrk izfroknhx.k rFkk izR;FkhZ dze&1 ls [email protected] ¼ftUgsa vkxs ^^oknhx.k^^ dgk tkosxk½ dh cgl lquh x;h] vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶21

nksuksa i{kksa ds vfHkopuksa ds vuqlkj ;g fooknjfgr fLFkfr gS fd i{kdkjksa ds ewy iq:"k@iwoZt :iflag th Fks] ftuds nks iq= ewyflag izR;FkhZ dze&1 rFkk xksdqy flag gq,A xksdqy flag dh fnukad 17-02-2025 dks e`R;q gks x;h rFkk muds dksbZ tSfod larku ugha gS] mudh iRuh izsedaoj izfroknh dze&2 ds :i esa ewy okn esa i{kdkj jgh gS tks orZeku ekeys eas vihykFkhZ dze&2 ds :i esa la;ksftr gSA ewyflag ds rhu iq= izgykn] Nhrj rFkk jkeflag gq, tks thfor gSaA

¶22

fookn ;gka ls izkjEHk gksrk gS fd dfFkr :i ls izseckbZ }kjk izfroknh dze&1 vFkkZr j.kthr flag iq= izgykn dks o"kZ 2009 esa xksn fy;k rFkk fnukad 06-03-2025 dks ;g xksnukek iathd`r djk;kA fo}ku vf/koDrk oknhx.k dk fuosnu gS fd ;g xksnukek fof/kd izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj ugha gS] o"kZ 2009 ds i'pkr j.kthr ds firk ds :i esa izgykn dk uke lHkh txg mYysf[kr gqvk gS rFkk 25 o"khZ; iq= dks fof/k&vuqlkj xksn fy;k tkuk vuqKs; ugha FkkA ;g Hkh fuosnu fd;k x;k gS fd izseckbZ ekufld o 'kkjhfjd :i ls vLoLFk o nqcZy gS] lkspus le>us dh 'kfDr ugha jgh gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa xksdqyflag dh lEifRr dks mldh iRuh izseckbZ rFkk dfFkr xksniq= j.kthr }kjk vUrfjr ugha fd;k tkos vkSj fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vihyk/khu vkns'k ds ek/;e ls vUrj.k ij jksd yxk;h x;h gSA

¶23

j.kthr dks fof/kd izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj izseckbZ }kjk xksn fy;k x;k gS vFkok ugha] ;g fookn dk fo"k; gS tks ewy okn esa fopkj.k ds mijkUr r; gksxkA vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa j.kthr flag dks vius dfFkr xksn firk xksdqy flag dh lEifRr dks vUrfjr djus ls tfj;s vLFkk;h O;kns'k vihyk/khu vkns'k ds ek/;e ls jksdk x;k gS] dh lhek rd vihyk/khu vkns'k fof/k&lEer gS ftlesa gLr{ksi fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA

[2025:RJ-JP:31488]

[CMA-2391/2025]

(3 of 3)

tgka rd izseckbZ dk iz'u gS] og Lohdr :i ls xksdqy flag dh iRuh gksdj xksdqy flag }kjk NksM+h x;h lEifRr dh mRrjkf/kdkjh gS rFkk mldk de ls de vk/kk fgLlk bl lEifRr esa gSA izseckbZ ds laca/k esa oknh i{k }kjk ;g vfHkdFku fd;k x;k gS fd og ekufld o 'kkjhfjd :i ls vLoLFk] nqcZy gksdj lkspus&le>us dh 'kfDr ugha j[krh gS] ijUrq bl laca/k esa dksbZ fpfdRlh; nLrkost vFkok vU; lqn< lkexzh vfHkdFkuksa ds vykok ugha jgh gS] ek= 80 o"kZ dh vk;q gks tkus ls dksbZ O;fDr lkspus&le>us dh 'kfDr ugha j[krk gS] ;g fu"d"kZ ugha fudkyk tk ldrkA bl izdkj izseckbZ dks mlds ifr dh NksM+h x;h lEifRr dk vk/kk fgLlk vUrfjr djus ls jksdk tkuk mfpr o fof/k&lEer ugha gSA vr% bl lhek rd ;g vihyk/khu vkns'k mikUrfjr gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶28

mijksDr foospukuqlkj ;g vihy vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj dj vihyk/khu vkns'k mikUrfjr djrs gq, ;g vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izfroknh dze&2@vihykFkhZ izseckbZ vius ifr }kjk NksMh x;h lEifRr esa vk/ks fgLls ls vf/kd lEifRr dks ewy okn ds fuLrkj.k rd vUrj.k] fodz; vkfn ugha djs rFkk ml ij dksbZ Hkkj Hkh l`ftr ugha djsA blh izdkj izfroknh dze&1@vihykFkhZ dks ikcUn fd;k tkrk gS fd og xksdqy flag dh lEifRr dk dksbZ Hkkx ewy okn ds fuLrkj.k rd fodz;] vUrfjr vFkok Hkkfjr ugha djsA

¶29

blh vuqlkj ;g vihy fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gSA

¶30

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶31

Mittal /36

Ranjeet Singh v. Mool Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjeet Singh v. Mool Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tata Motors Finance Ltd. Vs Om Prakash S/O Sh. Rameshwar Prasad Sain

Radheshyam S/O Moolchand Vs Ghanshyam S/O Pooniram

Mool Chand Gurjar S/O Shri Gangaram Gurjar Vs Sardar Singh Gurjar S/O Shri Kalyan Sahay

Hukumchand S/O Kesarlal Vs Rajendra Singh Gujar S/O Ramkhillad Gujar

Laxman S/O Nenulal Vs Ghasilal S/O Nenulal

Sukki Devi W/O Late Kaludas Vs Heerdas S/O Kaludas