Civil miscellaneous appeal concerning a temple property dispute; both sides jointly submitted the appeal had become infructuous. The High Court dismissed the appeal as infructuous without deciding any substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:27096]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 237/2024
Mandir Shri Swami Narayan Chikitsalya, Daduwara Vake Makan No. 2740, Jat Ke Kue Ka Rasta, 5Th Crossing (Old Ii Crossing) Purani Basti, Jaipur Through Its Next Friend, Authorised Representative Sevayat, Pujari, Prabhandhak, Sevadari, Beneficiary(1. Sunil Kumar Agarwal S/o Late Sh. Lal Chand Bhuteda, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Makan No. 2740, Jat Ke Kue Ka Rasta, 5Th Crossing (Old Ii Crossing) Purani Basti, Jaipur At Present R/o 87, Sumer Nagar, Mansarovar, Jaipur 2. Sunil Dutta Advocate S/o Late Shri Vishnu Dutta, Aged About 56 Years, R/o S-49-50, Janta Colony, Jaipur (Raj.).
----Appellant
Versus
(2 of 2)
[2025:RJ-JP:27096]
[CMA-237/2024]
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Krishan Chander Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aaditya Godara on behalf of Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
21/07/2025
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as for the respondents submit that the present appeal has become infructuous.
In view of the submissions made by learned counsels for the parties, the present civil misc. appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
ARTI SHARMA /195
Mandir Shri Swami Narayan Chikitsalya, Jaipur
Smt. Santosh Devi
Babu Lal Barala
Kandas Swami Chela Sh. Munna Baba
Chetnanand @ Chetan Das Chella Sh. Kandas
Sub-Registrar-V, Jaipur and other official respondents
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
