The appellant submitted that the main suit was decided during the pendency of the appeal, rendering it infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and dismissed the appeal as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:43976]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1609/2025
Hardeep Singh S/o Late Shri Kartar Singh Ramgadiya, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Nangal Nangali, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar At Present Residing At Sector 79, Sohana, S.a.s. Nagar, Maholi, Punjab
----Appellant
Versus
[2025:RJ-JP:43976]
[CMA-1609/2025]
(2 of 2)
(Raj.)
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Gajendra Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vipul Kumar Jaiman
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order
03/11/2025
(MANEESH SHARMA),J
PAYAL DHAWAN /51
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has become infructuous because the main suit was decided during pendency?
Hardeep Singh
Lakhvinder Singh
Garnail Singh
Darshan Singh
Harbhajan Singh
Harbhajan Kaur
MANEESH SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
