Dismissed

Govind Ram v. Champa Devi

Rajasthan HC21 Aug 2025CMA/1440/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This appeal challenged the share computation in an insurance commission order where ₹1,36,660 was distributed as ₹1,26,660 to the applicant's wife and ₹15,000 each to the two children. The court held that there was no factual finding regarding whether the within-limit amount could be disputed, thus dismissing the cross-objection and computing shares based on the actual distribution.

What did the court decide?

Cross objection dismissed; additional undertaking quashed.

Govind Ram Vs Champa Devi — Partition | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:33229]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1440/2004

¶4

Govind Ram S/O Chiranji Lal R/o Village Rarah Teh. Kumher Dist. Bharatpur.

¶5

Smt. Ramdei W/o Govind Ram R/o Village Rarah Teh Kumher Dist. Bharatpur

¶6

Performa Claimants/Appellant......

¶7

Versus

¶8

Champa Devi W/o Late Santosh Kumar.

¶9

Kumari Bharti D/o Late Santosh Kumar Minor Through natural Guardian mother Smt Champa Devi.

¶10

Kumari Anjali D/o Late Santosh Kumar Minor Through natural Guardian mother Smt Champa Devi.

¶11

All R/o D-21, Prem Colony, Nehru Nagar, Jaipur

¶12

Badan Singh S/o Balveer Singh R/o B-11, Ravi Apartment Dist. Faridabad, Haryana

¶13

Smt Bhagwati Devi W/o Satveer singh R/o Dudhera Teh and Dist. Gurgaon, Haryana

¶14

United India Insurance Company Limited Through Divisional Manager, M.I. Road, Jaipur.

¶15

Non Claimants/Respondents...

¶16

For Appellant(s)	: Mr.	Harshit Nehra for
	Mr.	Shantanu Gupta
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Lokesh Parihar

¶17

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI

¶18

Order

¶19

21/08/2025

¶20

vihykFkhZx.k us ;g vihy fo}ku vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k ¼ QkLV Vªsd la[;k 7½] t;iqj 'kgj t;iqj }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k 12@2004 esa ikfjr

[2025:RJ-JP:33229]

[CMA-1440/2004]

(2 of 3)

vkyksP; fu.kZ; fnukad 17-06-2004 ls O;fFkr gksdj vihy esa vafdr vk/kkjk s a ij izLrqr dh gSA

¶25

vihykFkhZx.k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk cgl ds nkSjku ;g rdZ jgk gS fd fnukad 25-05-2002 dks ,d lM+d nq?kZVuk esa muds iq= larks"k dqekj dk LoxZokl gks x;k FkkA muds iq= dh iRuh o vo;Ld iqf=;ksa us tfj, izkdfrd laj{kd o ekrk Dyse ;kfpdk varxZr /kkjk 166 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e ds varxZr izLrqr dh Fkh] ftlesa fo}ku vf/kdj.k us 12]66]000@& #i, izfrdj jkf'k vnk dh FkhA ftuesa ls vf/kdka'k jkf'k erd dh iRuh o muds vo;Ld iqf=;ksa dks ns nh xbZ FkhA Dyse ;kfpdk ds vizkFkhZ la[;k 4 o 5 tks bl bl izdj.k esa vihykFkhZx.k gSa] os e`rd ds ekrk&firk gSa] mUgsa 15]000@& #i, izR;sd dks fnyk, x, gSaA ,slh fLFkfr esa ns; izfrdj jkf'k esa mUgsa vf/kd jkf'k fnykbZ tk,A fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk tks izfrdj jkf'k fnykbZ xbZ gS muds laca/k esa muesa dksbZ fookn ugha gSA

¶26

izR;FkhZx.k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk cgl ds nkSjku ;g rdZ jgk gS fd tks izfrdj jkf'k fnykbZ xbZ gS] os Dyse ;kfpdk ds izkFkhZx.k o bl izdj.k ds vizkFkhZx.k izkIr dj pqds gSaA ,slh fLFkfr esa ,d rjg ls ;g vihy fu"izHkkoh gks pqdh gSA vihykFkhZx.k ds Lo;a ds vk; ds lk/ku gSa] os erd ij vkfJr ugha gSaA erd dh iRuh dh 26 o"khZ; mez o erd ds vo;Ld iqf=;ksa dks nf"Vxr j[krs gq, fo}ku vf/kdj.k us lgh :i ls {kfriwfrZ jkf'k dk fu/kkZj.k fd;k gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa ;g vihy vLohdkj dj [kkfjt dh tk,A

¶27

eSaus mHk;i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶28

bl izdj.k esa fo}ku vf/kdj.k us tks {kfriwfrZ vFkkZr ~ izfrdj jkf'k dk fu/kkZj.k fd;k gS] blds laca/k esa fdlh izdkj dk dksbZ fookn ugha gSA izdj.k esa lM+d nq?kZVuk esa larks"k dqekj dh e ** R;q gqbZ ml le; mlds nks vo;Ld iqf=;ka Fkha vkSj e ** rd larks"k dqekj dh 30 o"kZ dh vk;q Fkh vkSj e`rd larks"k dqekj ds fu/ku ls mldh 26 o"khZ; iRuh dks vius ifr ds

[2025:RJ-JP:33229]

[CMA-1440/2004]

(3 of 3)

lkgp;Z ls oafpr gksuk iM+k o mlds nks vo;Ld larku dks Hkh firk ds izse o Lusg ls oafpr gksuk iM+kA ,slh fLFkfr esa esjs fouez er esa fo}ku vf/kdj.k us tks jkf'k erd ds iRuh o larku dks fnyokbZ gS og vf/kd ugha dgh tk ldrh gSA vihykFkhZ xksfoUn jke ds vU; iq= Hkh gSa] tks jktLFkku iqfyl vkj,lh esa] dksVk esa flikgh ds in ij gSa] bl rF; dks xksfoUn jke us vius c;ku esa crk;k gSA xksfoUn jke ds dksbZ vk; dk lk/ku ugha gS] bl rF; dks xksfoUn jke us vius c;ku esa Li"V ugha fd;k gS] tcfd ,u-,-MCY;w 1 xksfoUn jke dh izfrijh{kk ds vuqlkj mldh 7 ch?kk tehu gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa ,u-,-MCY;w 1 xksfoUn jke erd ij vkfJr gks ;g rF; Hkh Li"V ugha gqvk gSA tks {kfriwfrZ jkf'k fnyokbZ xbZ gS mldk Hkqxrku gksuk crk;k x;k gS] ,slh fLFkfr esa bl Lrj ij fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk tks izfrdj jkf'k fnyokbZ xbZ gS] muds foHkktu esa dksbZ gLr{ksi fd, tkus dk dksbZ U;k;laxr mfpr vk/kkj ugha gSA vr% vihykFkhZx.k dh vihy vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶33

vr% vihy [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk fo}ku vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k ¼QkLV Vªsd la[;k 7½ }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k 12@2004 esa ikfjr vkyksP; fu.kZ; fnukad 17-06-2004 iq"V fd;k tkrk gSA layXu izkFkZuk i=] ;fn dksbZ gks] mijksDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;s tkrs gSaA

¶34

fo}ku vf/kdj.k dk vfHkys[k ;fn bl U;k;ky; dks izkIr gks j[kk gS] rks bl vkns'k dh izfr ds lkFk ykSVk;k tkosA

¶35

(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J

¶36

KISHAN SONI /01

Govind Ram v. Champa Devi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Govind Ram v. Champa Devi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narayani and Ors. Vs Ram Khiladi and Ors.

Sunil Vs Babu Lal and Others

Smt Kamla Vs Surajbhan and Others

Bhanwaroo Khan Vs Chela Ram and Ors.

Anil Kumar Goyal Vs Chatar Singh and Ors.

Kamruddin Mehrat and Another Vs Shahzad and Others