Partly allowed

Naneh Khan v. Abdul Sharif and Others

Rajasthan HC2 Apr 2025CMA/1070/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A motor accident compensation appeal seeking enhancement of the tribunal's award of Rs. 1,76,700 for a victim left permanently disabled. The court applied the Supreme Court's directive to add 10% future income increase to the permanent disability head, granting an additional Rs. 7,455 plus 7% interest.

What did the court decide?

Additional compensation of Rs. 7,455 over the tribunal award, with 7% p.a. interest on the enhanced amount from filing date till payment; other award terms intact.

Naneh Khan Vs Abdul Sharif and Others — Motor Accident Claims | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:14803]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1070/2016

¶4

Naneh Khan son of Abdul Shakoor aged 53 years, R/o Murti Crossing, Jhalawar Rajasthan

¶5

----Appellant

¶6

Versus

¶7

Abdul Sharif S/o Abdul Salim, R/o Nala Mohalla, Jhalawar District Jhalawar

¶8

Sabir Khan son of Subhan Khan, R/o near Kaleshah Baba Mazar, Jhalawar District Jhalawar

¶9

Universal Shampo General Insurance Company Limited Branch Office Kotdi Kota District Kota

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Virendra Agrawal, Adv. with Ms. Anjali Assat, Adv.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶13

Judgment / Order

¶14

02/04/2025

¶15

vihykFkhZ@izkFkhZ@vkgr dh vksj ls ;g vihy vUrxZr /kkjk 173 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e ds rgr izR;FkhZx.k ds fo:) fo}ku eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k >kykokM ftyk >kykokM }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k 442@15 esa ikfjr vokMZ o fu.kZ; fnukad 27-07-15 ls O;fFkr gksdj izfrdj jkf'k esa c<ksrjh gsrq izLrqr dh gS] ftlds ek/;e ls fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk fofHkUu enksa esa dqy 1]76]700@&:i;s dk vokMZ okf"kZd C;kt lfgr fuEukuqlkj ikfjr fd;k x;k gS%&

¶16

dz-la-	en	jkf'k
1-	nokbZ;ksa o bZykt esa O;; jkf'k	7]339@& :i;s
2-	ifjogu O;;	2]000@&:i;s
3-	ikSf"Vd vkgkj o ifjpkjd	20]000@&:i;s

[2025:RJ-JP:14803]

[CMA-1070/2016]

(2 of 3)

4-	bZYkkt gsrq vLirky esa HkrhZ jgus ds nkSjku gqbZ vk; dh {kfr	2]738@&:i;s
5-	;kph ds LFkkbZ fu;ksZX;rk ckcr~	74]541-72@&:i;s
6-	LFkkbZ fu;ksZX;rk vkus ls gqbZ ekufld ihMk o larki en esa	50]000@&:i;s
7-	ukWu fiD;wujh Msest en esa	20]000@&:i;s
	dqy izfrdj jkf'k	1]76]618-72@&:i;s
	jkm.M djus ij &&	1]76]700@&:i;s

¶21

vkjksfir okgu dh chek daiuh] okgu ekfyd o okgu pkyd dh vksj ls dksbZ vihy izLrqr ugha dh x;h gSA

¶22

fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk fuosnu gS fd vk; gkfu dh {kfr dh x.kuk djrs le; fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk Hkfo"; esa vk; of) ds ykHk ij fopkj ugha fd;k x;k gS tcfd ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk U;kf;d n"Vkar txnh'k cuke eksgu ¼2018½ 4 ,l lh lh 571 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk ds ekeys esa Hkh Hkfo"; vk; of) dk ykHk fn;k tkuk visf{kr gSA vkgr dh ?kVuk ds le; vk;q yxHkx 52 o"kZ Fkh rFkk mldk futh dk;Z djuk crk;k x;k gSA rn~uqlkj 10 izfr'kr Hkfo"; esa vk; of) dk ykHk fn;k tkuk visf{kr gSA 'ks"k enksa esa tks izfrdj jkf'k fnyk;h x;h gS] mls fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ }kjk pqukSrh ugha nh x;h gSA

¶23

fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ chek daiuh }kjk vihyk/khu fu.kZ; o vokMZ dks fof/klEer gksuk crkrs gq, ;g vihy [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶24

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶25

ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds mijksDr U;kf;d n"Vkar txnh'k cuke eksgu esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk ds ekeyksa esa Hkh Hkfo"; esa vk; of) dk 10 izfr'kr ykHk vihykFkhZ izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gSA vkgr dks vk; gkfu dh en esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk 74]54172@&:i;s izfrdj jkf'k fnykbZ xbZ gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr e s a 74]541-72 X

¶26

(3 of 3) [CMA-1070/2016]

¶27

[2025:RJ-JP:14803]

¶28

10 % = 7455/- :i;s izfrdj jkf'k esa c<ksrjh gksus ;ksX; gS vkSj bl lhek rd vihy Lohdkj gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶29

mijksDr foospukuqlkj vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vihy vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj dh tkdj fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk tks 1]76]700 @&:i;s dk vokMZ ikfjr fd;k x;k gS mlds vfrfjDr vihykFkhZ 7]455 @&:i;s izfrdj izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gSA bl vkns'k ds ek/;e ls tks izfrdj jkf'k c<k;h x;h gS] ml ij Hkh vihykFkhZ] fo}ku vf/kdj.k esa ;kfpdk lafLFkr fd;s tkus dh fnukad ls olwyh rd 07 izfr'kr lk/kkj.k okf"kZd C;kt dh nj ls C;kt izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gksxk] vk{ksfir vokMZ dh 'ks"k 'krsZa ;Fkkor jgsaxhA

¶30

fo}ku vf/kdj.k dk vfHkys[k ;fn bl U;k;ky; dks izkIr gks j[kk gS rks vkns'k dh izfr ds lkFk ykSVk;k tkosA

¶31

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶32

Murari Lal Sharma /60

Naneh Khan v. Abdul Sharif and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naneh Khan v. Abdul Sharif and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Nirmala Devi and Ors. Vs Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

Kailash Chand Soni Vs Vinod Kumar and Ors.

Smt Ramoti and Ors. Vs Babu Lal Agrawal

Mandawa Public School Mandawa Vs Ram Niwas Kaler and Others

Laxmi Prasad Vs Smt Mamta and Ors.

Smt Murli Devi and Ors. Vs Ram Narayan