Single judge order in civil contempt petition. Court held petitioner does not stand in order of merit and disposed of the petition, discharging notices, while reserving liberty to challenge the impugned order.
Contempt petition disposed of; notices discharged; liberty granted to challenge the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:2485]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 750/2024
Sukhveer Singh S/o Shri Amar Singh, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Basai Bhopal Singh, Post Majra, Tehsil Neemrana, District Alwar (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : | Mr. Kailash Chand Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : | Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG with |
| Mr. Ashutosh Udawat | ||
| Mr. Saurabh Sharma | ||
| Mr. Prateek Saxena |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order
17/01/2025
Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the State submits that he has filed reply and in which it has been mentioned that petitioner does not stand in the order of merit.
In this view of the matter, the contempt petition stands disposed of.
Notices stand discharged.
However, the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the order passed by the respondents in accordance with law.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Tahir/53
Sukhveer Singh
Shri Ravi Jain
Miss. Pratibha Verma
State Of Rajasthan
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
