Second contempt petition alleging wilful non-compliance of the order dated 16-11-2021 in writ petition 8654/2021. The court noted an earlier contempt petition (220/2022) had been dismissed on 05-07-2022 holding compliance complete, and dismissed this petition as not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:46515]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 596/2024
G.c Vyas Son Of Shri Dinesh Chandra, Aged About 82 Years, Resident Of C-302, Classic Residency Welfare Society, Nemi Nagar Extension, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : | Mr. G.C. Vyas, Petitioner present in Person. |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : | Mr. Divanshu Gupta, Adv. |
| Mr. TAnishq Jhavery, Adv. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
18/11/2025
,dyihB nhokuh fjV ;kfpdk la[;k 8654@2021 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 16-11-2021 dh dfFkr vogsyuk ds laca/k esa ;g voekuuk ;kfpdk izLrqr dh x;h gS] ftl ij O;fDr'k% :i ls mifLFkr izkFkhZ ,oa foi{kh dze&1 ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dks lquk x;k] vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
izkFkhZ dk fuosnu gS fd fnukad 16-11-2021 ds vkns'k dh ikyuk foi{kh la[;k&1 }kjk tkucw>dj ugha dh x;h gS vkSj voekuuk ds fy, nks"kfl) fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
fo}ku vf/koDrk foi{kh dk fuosnu gS fd bl laca/k esa iwoZ esa izFke voekuuk ;kfpdk la[;k 220@2022 ;kph }kjk izLrqr dh x;h Fkh rFkk dksbZ vogsyuk vFkok voekuuk ugha ekurs gq, vkns'k fnukad 05-07-2022 ds
(2 of 2) [CCP-596/2024]
[2025:RJ-JP:46515]
ek/;e ls ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tk pqdh gS] vr% ;g f}rh; voekuuk ;kfpdk iks"k.kh; ugha gSA
nksuksa i{kksa dh vksj ls izLrqr rdksaZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA
vkns'k fnukad 16-11-2021 dh dfFkr vogsyuk ds laca/k esa iwoZ esa Hkh voekuuk ;kfpdk la[;k 220@2022 izLrqr dh x;h Fkh] ftlesa bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk ;g vkns'k fn;k x;k fd U;kf;d vkns'k dh ikyuk gks pqdh gS rFkk dksbZ voekuuk dk rF; izdV ugha gks jgk gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa tc ,d fookn fo"k; iwoZ esa fu.khZr gks pqdk gS rks ml ifjfLFkfr esa ;g f}rh; voekuuk ;kfpdk led{k ihB ds le{k iks"k.kh; ugha gSA
rnuqlkj ;g voekuuk ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkrh gS] foi{khx.k dks tkjh'kqnk uksfVl lekIr fd;s tkrs gSaA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Mittal /37
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a second contempt petition for alleged non-compliance of the 16.11.2021 order is maintainable when an earlier contempt petition was already dismissed with notice of compliance.
G.C. Vyas
Shri Ram Kumar Verma, Dy. Commissioner, Zone-7, J.D.A., Jaipur
State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
