Contempt petition rendered infructuous as respondents decided petitioner's representation after filing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:14971]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 286/2025
Anil Kumar S/o Shri Bhanwarilal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Gramin Kshetriya Baroda Bank Wali Gali, Mania, Dholpur Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Abhishek B. Sharma |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
03/04/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing the contempt petition, respondents have decided the petitioner’s representation. Hence, the contempt petition has been rendered infructuous.
It is disposed of accordingly.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Ritu/33
Anil Kumar
Govind Mohan
Amrat Mohan Prasad
H.n.s. Bisht
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
