Contempt petition against revenue officials; counsel for the petitioner submitted that effective compliance with the underlying order had been made. The Division Bench closed the contempt proceedings and discharged the notices issued to the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 207/2025
Hariprasad Malhotra S/o Shri Ginniram, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Pavta, Tehsil Tahala, District Alwar
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.R. Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG with Ms. Shikha Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT
Order
11/08/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now compliance has been made.
Considering the fact that effective compliance has been made, contempt proceedings are closed.
Notices stand discharged.
(SANJEET PUROHIT),J
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
Brijesh 40.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt proceedings could be closed upon reported compliance with the earlier order.
Hariprasad Malhotra
Dinesh Kumar, Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue
Artika Shukla, District Collector, Alwar
Seema Khaitan, Sub Divisional Officer, Rajgarh
Sharad Rathia, Tehsildar Rajgarh
State of Rajasthan
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Sanjeet Purohit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
