Arbitration application seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator under a 2008 agreement was withdrawn by the applicant after respondents disclosed ongoing resolution proceedings; permission granted to pursue claims with the Resolution Professional.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:46035]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Arbitration Application No. 33/2024
Hanuman Sahai Sharma S/o Late Shri Rugnath Sharma, R/o Nayala, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur. (Raj.)
----Applicant
----Respondents
| For Applicant(s) | : Ms. Apoorwa Agarwal, Mr. Avinash Bhardwaj on behalf of Mr. Himanshu Jain |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Rishabh Khandelwal on behalf of Mr. Ravindra Pal Singh |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order
14/11/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:46035]
[ARBAP-33/2024]
(2 of 2)
in the resolution proceedings pending before the concerned Resolution Professional, Mr. Anish Niranjan Nanavaty, appointed by the NCLT vide order dated 21.06.2019.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J
Seema/110
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hanuman Sahai Sharma
Reliance Communication Infrastructure Ltd.
Reliance Communication/Telecom Ltd.
Maneesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
