The High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a case involving offences under the BNS and IT Act, noting the offences were triable by a Magistrate and trial would take time, while expressly avoiding opinion on merits.
Regular bail granted subject to furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:42834]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13515/2025
Sahid S/o Shri Samsu, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Chandoli, Police Station Vijay Mandir, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Alwar).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aslam S. Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P. Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, P.P.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order
17/10/2025
This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.237/2025 registered at Police Station Shivaji Park, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Section(s) 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 61(2) & 112(2) of BNS and under Section 66D of IT Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accusedpetitioner is innocent, has been falsely implicated in this case and FIR has been lodged merely on apprehension. Learned counsel further submits that the offence(s) are triable by Magistrate and the FIR does not reveal any transaction of amount. Learned counsel also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since 24.09.2025 and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.
[2025:RJ-JP:42834]
[CRLMB-13515/2025]
(2 of 2)
Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that offence(s) are triable by Magistrate, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accusedpetitioner Sahid S/o Shri Samsu shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J
DANISH USMANI /644
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused-petitioner is entitled to regular bail in light of the nature of offences and period of detention?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sahid
State Of Rajasthan
Baljinder Singh Sandhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
